My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01764
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01764
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:06:48 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:02:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
2/16/1960
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> MR. McCANDLESS: <br /> MR. SPARKS: <br /> MR. McCANDLESS: <br />I MR. SPARKS : <br /> MR. McCANDLESS: <br /> MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. PETERSON: <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br />MR. NELSON: <br /> <br />_v...... <br /> <br />"It's been completed." <br /> <br />"It has been completed?" <br /> <br />"Yes, it has." <br /> <br />"The last I checked on it - I believe I <br />checked with both you and Mr. Nelson and with <br />the Colorado River District - it was in the pro- <br />cess of organization. If it has been organ- <br />ized. . .. .." <br /> <br />"It has been organized and consumers have <br />been signed, I think, completely." <br /> <br />"We have had no word on it. If it has, then <br />that answers our question. We have the report on <br />the Savery-Pot Hook and we are anxious now to <br />turn it over to someone. If you can give us <br />someone's name who will be responsible for the <br />comments on that report, that's what we are after <br />at the present time. <br /> <br />We can't do anything about what is in pro- <br />cess and what has been completed. What I am <br />speaking of now is future investigations. As <br />you can see, we have other projects starting <br />every year beginning with 1961. If those people <br />don't want the project they should say so now <br />before the Government spends a quarter of a <br />million or a half million dollars in investiga- <br />tions. Those people should be in on the progress, <br />we think, of the Bureau's activities. They know <br />better than anyone else what the situation is in <br />any given area and they should determine the pro- <br />gress of the investigation and the scope of the <br />investigation. Our staff can't possibly do it. <br />We want the local people to say what they want. <br />When things occur in the progress of the investi- <br />gation then they should point them out and we <br />will do everything then in our power to get what <br />they want." <br /> <br />"Larry, in looking over this list here, I do <br />not see the Juniper Project. It seems to me that <br />we have taken action in the past on the Juniper." <br /> <br />"There has been no action on the Juniper." <br /> <br />"Mr. Chairman, the <br />reconnaissance study. <br />son. It's in the very <br /> <br />Juniper is now under a <br />That's probably the rea- <br />first stage." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.