My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01764
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01764
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:06:48 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:02:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
2/16/1960
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />MR. BUNGER: <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br />MR. BUNGER: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />.l.UV,", <br /> <br />'reckoned in continuing progressive series' <br />means?" <br /> <br />"That's from the Colorado River Compact. It <br />means that each year begins another ten-year <br />period. You go from one to ten - that's .one .ten- <br />year period. You go from two to eleven - that's <br />another ten-year period. Three to twelve is <br />another ten-year period, starting from the begin- <br />ning of the operation. It's a progressive series. <br />Are there any more questions on (a)? <br /> <br />Under (b) there is no change there. That, <br />as you will see, is a rather harsh provision. We <br />said that the San Juan-Chama Project must be <br />junior to all rights in Colorado whether now in <br />existence or hereafter constructed." <br /> <br />"You did add the last two lines." <br /> <br />nOh, yes. We did add the last two lines, as <br />provided in the Compacts. Article IX in both <br />compacts states that. So we made specific refer- <br />ence to those provisions in the Rio Grande Com- <br />pact and the Upper Colorado River Basin Compact. <br /> <br />Of course New Mexico is not happy with this <br />provision but since it so states in the compacts, <br />we thought it should again be set out in this <br />authorizing legislation. <br /> <br />We made no changes in what was <br />discussed in the rest of the page. <br />remain in there." <br /> <br />originally <br />The line-outs <br /> <br />"I'd like to make some comments on (b)." <br /> <br />"Mr. Bunger." <br /> <br />"I made the surveys for the San Juan-Chama <br />and the Navajo Irrigation Projects originally for <br />the Bureau of Reclamation and in my opinion, in- <br />stead of calling this the initial stage, it <br />should be the final stage because, if New Mexico <br />takes over 140,000 acre-feet a year, uses that <br />we can make in Colorado will be done away with. <br />If we are going to protect the uses in Colorado <br />that should be the final stage of the San Juan- <br />Chama." <br /> <br />"Mr. Bunger, if you will recall in the min- <br />utes of the last meeting that was a question <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.