My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01762
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01762
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:06:45 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:01:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/14/1959
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1310 <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. -BARNARD,JI?: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />memberships. We think that the news- <br />letter should be in the hands of every- <br />body in Colorado, but we think that every- <br />body in Colorado ought to be interested <br />enough in the newsletter to pay the ten <br />bucks to get it. That's about the size <br />of it." <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />"I think that is being a little opti- <br />mistic. A lot of people are interested <br />but not ten bucks worth and what-I would <br />like to see - to me if I were a layman, <br />and I am in many respects, it would be <br />much easier to analyze the preliminary <br />report with the information here and if <br />it would be possible (I have raised this <br />question before with the Board and I have been <br />turned down), but I think with the Legis- <br />lature, at least while the Legislature is <br />in session and particularly with this <br />volume, is there some generous benefactor <br />among the sustaining members who could see <br />that the Legislators received copies during <br />the present session? I am sure there is <br />and I am going to count on it." <br /> <br />"There is this about it. In maintain- <br />ing the strength of the organization, we <br />feel it is also necessary to maintain its <br />autonomy and a decision such as that, as <br />far as I am personally concerned, I don't <br />want to be hyper-technical about it, but <br />it would have to be made by the Executive <br />Committee because we have adhered pretty <br />closely to the policy of only mailing, with <br />the exception of the newspapers, the newslet- <br />ter to members of the Water Congress. <br /> <br />Perhaps the Executive Committee, on the <br />recommendation of the Water Board, would go <br />into the matter again to see if an exception <br />could be made. That would be their decision <br />and not mine certainly and of course, if <br />there are any generous benefactors, we are <br />more than happy to have their support." <br /> <br />"Unless any of the members of the Board <br />disagree with-me, I will express the opinion <br />of the Board that we would like to have the <br />Executive Committee of the Water Congress <br />try and work that out. I think members of <br />the Legislature have already sacrificed <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.