Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />939 <br /> <br />Alternate Damsites.--In selecting the most feasible <br />site for a reservoir to accomplish flood control and conservation <br />storage for the lower reach of the South Platte River, studies <br />were made of six different damsites on the South Platte River in <br />Morgan and Weld Counties, Colorado. Designated in downstream <br />order, these are the Hardin, Goodrich, Weldona, Narrows, Fort <br />Morgan, and Old Fort Morgan sites--the only sites found in the <br />vicinity that could conceivably be considered as alternates for <br />accomplishing the same purposes as the Narrows Dam. <br /> <br />Hardin Site.--The capacity of a reservoir to the physical <br />limits o~ the Hardin site would be 423,000 acre-feet at maximum <br />water surface elevation 4570. In order to maintain service to <br />the Empire Canal, it would be necessary to have a minimum water <br />surface elevation of 4548. At this water surface elevation, the <br />dead storage would be 191,000 acre-feet, leaving only 232,000 <br />acre-feet of active storage. Studies of historical floods indi- <br />cate a capacity of at least 325,000 acre-feet is necessary to <br />control historical floods on the South Platte River. To achieve <br />full flood control benefits, it would be necessary to provide <br />this 325,000 acre-foot capacity on the South Platte River and <br />also control Bijou Creek floods by a structure on Bijou Creek, <br />and it is essential that such capacity be held for storage of <br />floods. As soon as water has been stored in the reservoir to <br />reduce ,a flood peak, it is necessary that the water be released <br />as quickly as the channel can again accommodate it so that the <br />space may be made available for controlling a subsequent flood. <br />Unless the operation of flood control space is accomplished in <br />this manner, no flood control benefits can accrue to the project, <br />and costs cannot be considered as non-reimbursable. If the <br />capacity of the Hardin site were used to store water for irriga- <br />tion, with water held over until such time as it could be used <br />for that purpose, only minor incidental flood control would <br />result and nearly all costs of construction would have to be <br />considered as reimbursable. Under such an arrangement the Hardin <br />site can produce far less benefits than Narrows and it is clear- <br />ly less feasible than Narrows. It could not be recommended for <br />construction. <br /> <br />Goodrich Site.--Foundation conditions are unfavorable at <br />this site, and the volume of embankment necessary to develop the <br />required storage would be excessive. Outlets for both the <br />Jackson Lake Inlet and the Weldona Canal would be required in <br />the north abutment of the dam. Sediment would enter the <br />reservoir from Kiowa Creek near the damsite and endanger the em- <br />bankment. The factors of high cost and the potential danger to <br />the embankment eliminate this site when it is compared with the <br />downstream sites of Weldona, Narrows, and Fort Morgan. <br />