Laserfiche WebLink
<br />918 <br /> <br />BOAR1J ACTIONS ON NARROWS RFSERVOIR <br /> <br />April 25, 1949 <br /> <br />Board recommended that full investigation be made, and <br />construction started only after approval by Board. <br />This position was re-affirmed at meeting of <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />December 16. 1949. <br />December 18. 1950. <br /> <br />Consulting engineer Tipton reported that studies by the <br />Bureau of Reclamation favored the Narrows site, in preference <br />to the Fort Morgan site, and that reservoir plans were being <br />materially changed to make a more acceptable project. <br /> <br />June 11, 1951. <br /> <br />Director reported that because of the intense local <br />interest and plans for the Narrows dam, it appeared advisable <br />for the Board to arrange and sponsor a series of public hearings <br />on this project. He suggested that, if possible, such hearings <br />be limited to three and that they be held at Fort Morgan, <br />Sterling and Greeley. <br /> <br />On motion, the Board authorized holding a series of <br />meetings and reports to the Board of their results and a resume <br />of the various views of local interests, in order that the Board <br />could consider the same in preparing comments on the project. <br /> <br />May 5" 1952. <br /> <br />Director Stone called attention to the compilation of <br />the records of hearings which had been held at Fort Morgan, <br />Sterling and Greeley. He also reported on a meeting sponsored <br />by the Sterling Chamber of Commerce and which was attended by <br />him. This meeting was attended by about two hundred people. <br />Statements were made by representatives of Region 7, Bureau <br />of Reclamation, concerning the plans for the project, including <br />its operational plans, and supplemental surveys and investigations <br />on the project which had been undertaken and which were desired <br />by the Colorado Water Conservation Board and the locally <br />affected interests. Before the meeting closed, a vote disclosed <br />that all except two of the persons present favored the construc- <br />tion of the project and the plan of operation. <br /> <br />I <br />