My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01741
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01741
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:06:30 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:01:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
6/20/1955
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />/ <br />~ <br />~98 <br /> <br />The reappraisal was summarized in a supplemental <br />report on Rio Grande and Weminuche Pass Divisions, <br />San Luis Valley Project, dated February, 1953. The <br />report presented a plan for a 1,050,000 acre-foot <br />reservoir at the Wagon Wheel Gap site, together with a <br />50,000 kw capacity power plant at the toe of the dam, <br />a transmission system and a 1,000 acre-foot after bay <br />downstream at the Coller Dam Site. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The cost of the dam and reservoir, as proposed in <br />this report, was about $32,500,000, and the total project <br />cost was more than $51,000,000, exclusive of the <br />Weminuche Diversion which was estimated at $2,700,000. <br />The allocations of costs, in percentage of total costs, <br />were: Irrigation 42 per cent, flood control 12 per cent, <br />power 46 per cent, and a small amount to recreation. As <br />for the amount allocated to irrigation and flood control <br />combined, irrigation represented 77 per cent and flood <br />control 23 per cent . <br /> <br />This February 1953 report. was transmitted to the <br />States of Colorado, New Mexico and Texas, and to <br />interested Federal agencies for comments. It was <br />. considered by the Water Conservation Board at its <br />meeting on August 6, 1953 and the resulting official <br />State comments were transmitted to the Secretary of the <br />Interior under date of August 12, 1953. <br /> <br />The position taken by Colorado in these comments was <br />that the project as recommended at that time was not the <br />most economical one which could be conceived for the area, <br />and neither the power features or a reservoir~with a <br />capacity of 1,000,000 acre-feet could be justified. The <br />amount of flood control benefits which were assigned to <br />the project in that report were also questioned as being <br />unrealistic. It was recommended that determinations be <br />made of a reservoir which will provide the greatest benefit <br />at the least cost, the manner in which the operation of <br />the reservoir can be coordinated with the use of ground <br />water storage, and a re-evaluation of flood control I <br />benefits in Colorado and New Mexico which will result . <br />from the project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.