Laserfiche WebLink
<br />/ <br />~ <br />~98 <br /> <br />The reappraisal was summarized in a supplemental <br />report on Rio Grande and Weminuche Pass Divisions, <br />San Luis Valley Project, dated February, 1953. The <br />report presented a plan for a 1,050,000 acre-foot <br />reservoir at the Wagon Wheel Gap site, together with a <br />50,000 kw capacity power plant at the toe of the dam, <br />a transmission system and a 1,000 acre-foot after bay <br />downstream at the Coller Dam Site. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The cost of the dam and reservoir, as proposed in <br />this report, was about $32,500,000, and the total project <br />cost was more than $51,000,000, exclusive of the <br />Weminuche Diversion which was estimated at $2,700,000. <br />The allocations of costs, in percentage of total costs, <br />were: Irrigation 42 per cent, flood control 12 per cent, <br />power 46 per cent, and a small amount to recreation. As <br />for the amount allocated to irrigation and flood control <br />combined, irrigation represented 77 per cent and flood <br />control 23 per cent . <br /> <br />This February 1953 report. was transmitted to the <br />States of Colorado, New Mexico and Texas, and to <br />interested Federal agencies for comments. It was <br />. considered by the Water Conservation Board at its <br />meeting on August 6, 1953 and the resulting official <br />State comments were transmitted to the Secretary of the <br />Interior under date of August 12, 1953. <br /> <br />The position taken by Colorado in these comments was <br />that the project as recommended at that time was not the <br />most economical one which could be conceived for the area, <br />and neither the power features or a reservoir~with a <br />capacity of 1,000,000 acre-feet could be justified. The <br />amount of flood control benefits which were assigned to <br />the project in that report were also questioned as being <br />unrealistic. It was recommended that determinations be <br />made of a reservoir which will provide the greatest benefit <br />at the least cost, the manner in which the operation of <br />the reservoir can be coordinated with the use of ground <br />water storage, and a re-evaluation of flood control I <br />benefits in Colorado and New Mexico which will result . <br />from the project. <br />