Laserfiche WebLink
<br />? 1'292 <br /> <br />General's office, a man who could do the <br />routine work and could help the Director <br />with a great many jobs within the office. <br />This is the consensus of the Committee-~ <br />both are proper objectives. The primary <br />.objective is getting the contingent <br />appropriation." <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. MOSES: <br /> <br />"In reference to the Legal Technician, no <br />action is necessary now except to:try and <br />work out a description of his job." <br /> <br />Further discussion of the matter continued. <br /> <br />MR. ROBERTS: <br /> <br />"1 was just wondering whether it would be <br />advisable not to take any action on this <br />recommendation until Mr. Chilson could <br />give his opinion. <br /> <br />"1 think there is no doubt that it <br />will meet with Mr. Chilson's full approval. <br />I think we could act on the first recom- <br />mendation and postpone crystallizing our <br />views on the other until Mr. Chilson can <br />comment on it and until the Director and <br />Attorney General can formulate specifica- <br />tions for the job." <br /> <br />MR. DUNBAR: <br /> <br />"It was the consensus that we explore the <br />possibilities 'and report back to the Board." <br /> <br />MR. ROBERTS: <br /> <br />"1 move that we empower the Director to <br />request a contingent appropriation of <br />$25,000 for the employment of legal and <br />technical professional service in the <br />event of interstate water litigation and <br />that the other matter be. referred to the <br />Director and Attorney General for exploring <br />the further details." <br /> <br />The motion' was seconded by Mr. Crawford and on <br />vote, was carried unanimously. <br /> <br />I <br />