My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01741
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01741
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:06:30 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:01:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
6/20/1955
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />S <br />....279 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />6. That all effort be made to secure an <br />appropriation concurrently with authorization (should <br />authorization be required). <br /> <br />7. That :the officers and employees of <br />San Luis Valley Water Conservancy District be and <br />they are hereby authorized and empowered to do all <br />things necessary or desirable in order to secure the <br />quickest possible successful completion of the project. <br /> <br />MR. MOSES: <br /> <br />"Dean Crawford had suggested earlier <br />that I write him concerning any <br />comments that we might want considered <br />when the State was making up its <br />official comments. I have written a <br />letter under date of June 18, which <br />reads as follows:" <br /> <br />June 18, 1955 <br /> <br />Hon. Ivan C. Crawford, Director <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />State Office Building <br />Denver, Colorado <br /> <br />Dear Dean Crawford: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />You have indicated that you would be interested in <br />receiving the comments of the San Luis Valley Water <br />Conservancy District concerning the proposed report of <br />the Bureau of Reclamation on Wagon Wheel Gap Dam. <br /> <br />I hand you herewith a Resolution adopted by the <br />Board of Directors of the Conservancy District which <br />pretty well outlines the position of the District on <br />the report. <br /> <br />I think I should make it clear that if absolutely <br />necessary the District would accept the report as it <br />stands rather than cause any further delay of the <br />project. However, certain matters I feel can "be <br />handled without causing any unnecessary delay. <br /> <br />Let me take the things up one at a time as they <br />appear in the R~solution. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.