My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01732
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01732
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:06:25 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:01:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/20/1974
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />bluff there on the right side of the picture. This would be an earth- <br />fill darn, where the other two are concrete-arch, and it would be <br />something like 13,000 feet long. It would be a very long dam. <br /> <br />(slide) The St. Phillips Church and Bear Canyon cemetery would be in <br />the reservoir area, both of which are on the National Register of <br />historical sites. <br /> <br />(slide) This is the headquarters of the Sinclair Cattle Company, which <br />is in the valley, a very prominent land and cattle operation in the <br />area. <br /> <br />(slide) Here is another of the farmsteads in the area - very, very <br />elaborate. Lights please. <br /> <br />I would like to summarize this presentation with trying to bring you <br />up to date on where we are on investigations. We intend to have the <br />first draft of our report finished by June 30 of this year. Looking <br />at the individual items that we have to work with, the nondevelopment <br />or the base condition, we feel we are about ninety per cent complete <br />with that. The management plan, we look at that in two parts. We <br />have the river recreation aspects of it primarily worked by the BOR. <br />We see as about three-fourths finished. And the conservation measures, <br />about eighty per cent done with that. As we look at the storage <br />alternatives, we feel the engineering, the geology, the mapping, the <br />engineering estimates are about eighty-five per cent complete with that. <br />The collection of economic data, about ninety per cent. The economic <br />and financial analysis, only about ten per cent. Of course, we can't <br />really analyze the thing until we have all the facts together. So that <br />work is coming up shortly. The environmental data collection, we feel <br />we have about eighty-five per cent of that. The actual rating work, <br />maybe about twenty per cent. We have quite a bit of work to do on the <br />rating and for the most part, they have to kind of wait and see what <br />components are going to be in a plan before they can intelligently <br />rate an area - how much recreation is going to be there, this kind of <br />thing, where the road layout is going to be. Recreation plans, we feel <br />are about half finished and the write-up of all the other proposals <br />which we have looked at, and there have been numerous. We have looked <br />at all different alternatives, raising Cherry Creek, raising Chatfield, <br />raising Dillon, a plains reservoir, extensive development of ground <br />water. We have fifteen or twenty of these different alternatives that <br />we have looked at and decided weren't worth being pursued any further. <br />So we will have a brief write-up on each of those. As I say, we <br />intend to finish the report, the first draft the continuation, by <br />June 30. Hopefully, by the end of October the draft EIS and the proposed <br /> <br />-9- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.