Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Impact of Tamarisk Infestation on the <br />Water Resources of Colorado <br />May 30, 2003 <br /> <br />state's rivers and streams. Other plants, notably Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia), co-habit <br />with tamarisk and also deserve attention. Therefore, within the context of this study, whenever <br />the tenn "tamarisk" is used it also includes Russian-olive as the other principal invasive plant <br />that may be important to control within riparian areas. <br /> <br />Report Outline <br /> <br />This report is intended to provide some fundamental answers on the tamarisk problem in <br />Colorado that may be important for water managers within the state to understand; i.e., <br /> <br />~ How many acres of tamarisk exist in Colorado? <br />~ How much water is being used by tamarisk versus native plant species? and <br />~ What is the cost of tamarisk control and reve~tation? <br /> <br />2.0 Tamarisk Inventory in Colorado <br /> <br />An inventory of infestation by tamarisk and the other principal non- native phreatophyte <br />identified by the Colorado Department of Agriculture, Russian-olive, is a crucial element in tre <br />development of a control plan at the state-wide scale. The inventory becomes the basis for <br />project planning (e.g., cost estimates, resource allocation, scheduling) and tracking the long-tenn <br />success of control efforts. <br /> <br />The Colorado Department of Agriculture has assembled maps of weed infestations within the <br />state based on input from county weed managers. A tabulation, by county, of tamarisk and <br />Russian-olive infestation is presented in Table I and depicted in Figures I and 2, respectively for <br />each plant species. Based on this infonnation, there are over 28,000 acres of tamarisk and over <br />10,000 acres of Russian-olive. However, there is a problem with the infonnation. Many <br />counties did not report any infestations. For example Bent County in southeastern Colorado is <br />located on the lower Arkansas River and has the large John Martin Reservoir within its political <br />boundary. This area is known for its abundance of tamarisk with counties on all sides having <br />significant infestations. The Corps of Engineers, which operates the John Martin Reservoir site, <br />has reported that the lower Arkansas River main stem has an estimated 12,000 acres of tamarisk <br />as compared to 6,200 acres reported by the Department of Agriculture for this area; or a 100% <br />difference. In Yuma County, the county weed manager has found 500 acres surrounding Bonny <br />Reservoir but the state weed inventory has only 73 acres listed. EI Paso County reports no <br />tamarisk or Russian-olive, yet the invasive species coordinator for Fort Carson reports significant <br />infestation along Fountain Creek. Larimer County shows no infestations along the South Platte <br />River, yet Morgan and Adams counties on either side have some degree of infestation. Other <br />counties, from personal observation, such as La Plata, Archuleta, and Conejos counties have <br />infestations but have not reported any. <br /> <br />5 <br />