Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Impact of Tamarisk Infestation on the <br />Water Resources of Colorado <br />May 30, 2003 <br /> <br />3) Estimates on water consumption by tamarisk vary a great deal depending on location, <br />maturity, density of infestation, and depth to groundwater. Using past research, <br />tamarisk will generally use approximately 1 foot per year more than a cottonwood and <br />willow community and 4 feet per year more than an upland plant community of native <br />grasses/sage/rabbit brush Russian-olive has similar non-beneficial use values. For <br />Colorado, based on observation, it is estimated that one-third of the land currently <br />infested by tamarisk and Russian-olive was formerly occupied by cottonwood/willow <br />communities and two-thirds by grasses/sage/rabbit brush communities. Using the <br />estimated infested acreage of 57,000 acres in Colorado, the predicted non-beneficial <br />water consumption is approximately 170,000 acre- feet per year. <br /> <br />4) The impact of uncontrolled tamarisk infestation over the next 50 years is a water loss <br />ranging from 290,000 to nearly 600,000 acre-feet of water per year. By comparison, the <br />Denver Water Board serviced 1,100,000 people with 250,000 acre-feet of water in 2001. <br /> <br />5) Costs for removal vary depending on the expanse of the infestation, existence of other <br />valuable plant species, and terrain. Aerial helicopter spraying with herbicide has a cost <br />between $200 and $250 per acre, Irechanical mulching and herbicide application ranges <br />in cost from $300 to $800 per acre, and hmd clearing and herbicide application ranges <br />from $1,500 to $5,000 per acre. Additionally, a new bio-control approach that uses a <br />Chinese leaf beetle is being researched by the U.S. Departments of Interior and <br />Agriculture and may help further to reduce costs. No one approach is right for all <br />situations; Integrated Pest Management that matches the right methods for each <br />situation is the recommended strategy by the Colorado Department of Agriculture. <br /> <br />6) Removal is only part of the cost. Restoration is the other component which is necessary <br />to bring back the right native plants and restore habitat. Restoration may occur <br />naturally where native plants are still viable or may require specialized efforts. In <br />general, costs range from $50 to $1,500 per acre. <br /> <br />7) Using an average cost of tamarisk control and revegetation of $750/acre, 57,000 acres <br />of infestation in 2003, and 170,000 acre- feet of water potentially saved within Colorado; <br />the resulting overall cost for control and revegetation is $43,000,000 or approximately <br />$250 per acre- foot of water resources recovered. <br /> <br />8) Beyond improving the abundance of water, the extremely important side benefits of <br />tamarisk control and riparian restoration are: <br />>> Enhanced water quality, <br />>> Improved wildlife habitat, <br />>> Greater bio-diversity among both plants and animals, and <br />>> Improved conditions for human enjoyment of the river systems. <br /> <br />There are still several areas of research needed to complete the understanding of the tamarisk <br />problem in Colorado. These areas are highlighted in the report and can be supported by current <br />legislative efforts within the U.S. Congress (H.R. 695 and H.R. and S. 1051, S. 1236). <br /> <br />2 <br />