Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Impact of Tamarisk Infestation on the <br />Water Resources of Colorado <br />May 30, 2003 <br /> <br />Executive Summary <br /> <br />This document is prepared for the Colorado Department of Natural Resources' Water <br />Conservation Board to provide a basic understanding of the tamarisk problem in Colorado and <br />specifically its impact on the state's water resources. Funding for this work was provided by the <br />Conservation Board to the Tamarisk Coalition to prepare this report. <br /> <br />Tamarisk (Tamarix spp., also known as saltcedar) is a tenacious plant that has a deep root system <br />(up to 100 feet) and leaves a salt residue in the soil. These characteristics enable tamarisk to <br />quickly replace native riparian vegetation, such as cottonwoods and willows, resulting in thickets <br />that: <br />~ Increase soil salinity, rendering the soil unsuitable for other plants. <br />~ Have less value as wildlife habitat than native vegetation. <br />~ Widen floodplains by clogging stream channels. <br />~ Impact endangered fish by changing stream morphology. <br />~ Increase fire hazard and intensity. <br />~ Diminish human enjoyment of and interaction with the river environment. <br /> <br />While each of trese points is important to one or more constituencies, the single most critical <br />problem with tamarisk is that it uses more water than the native riparian vegetation that it <br />replaces; such as cottonwoods and willows. As tamarisk moves into adjacent upland habitats, it <br />consumes even more water as it replaces the native grass/sage/rabbit brush plant communities <br />which are low water consumers. This nOlrbeneficial user of the West's limited water resources <br />dries up springs, wetlands, and riparian areas by lowering water tables. The term "nOlrbeneficial <br />water use" is defined as the difference in water consumption (evapotranspiration) between <br />tamarisk and the native plants it has replaced. <br /> <br />This report is intended to provide some fundamental answers on Colorado's tamarisk problem <br />that may be important for water managers within the state to understand; i.e., 1) How many acres <br />of tamarisk exist in Colorado? 2) How much water is being used by tamarisk versus native plant <br />species? and 3) What is the cost of tamarisk control and reve~tation? Findings from previous <br />and new research, and from interviews and observations are: <br /> <br />1) The estimated tamarisk infestation in Colorado is 42,000 acres and 15,000 acres for <br />Russian-olive or a total of 57,000 acres. Russian-olive is included with tamarisk <br />because it is the other non-native phreatophyte that the Department of Agriculture has <br />identified as a problem in Colorado. Infestations occur on every major river drainage in <br />the state with the exception of the North Platte. <br /> <br />2) Using annual rates for new encroachment ranging from 1 to 2.5 percent per year, <br />infestations are predicted to increase to between 90,000 and 200,000 acres over the next <br />50 years if no active control program is put into place. <br /> <br />1 <br />