Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />and must be abandoned. The U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service has <br />agreed in principle and thus will phase out this approach. The <br />Ruedi section 7 will therefore examine several new approaches <br />that will certainly influence future section 7's. Thus, close <br />scrutiny is required. The net result to date is that the <br />states will have an opportunity to review and comment on the <br />Ruedi biological opinion in late May and prior to final <br />approval. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The third concern expressed relates to the existing <br />so-called "Recovery Plans." These plans as they stand are <br />inadequate as recovery plans because they state only the <br />objective and do not provide for any implementation. This is <br />just not acceptable. <br /> <br />The fourth concern expressed revolved around the substance <br />of various alternatives being proposed. There will be major <br />obstacles to overcome in order to implement some of the <br />considered alternatives. <br /> <br />Finally, the Coordinating Committee and its endeavors must <br />be concluded. Discussion revolved around what documents are <br />required of the committee. The question, Should a proposed <br />recovery plan be prepared?, was also raised. Colorado <br />indicated that Mr. Getches and staff were writing some <br />documents for presentation at the next Coordinating Committee . <br />meeting and will also present the same to the Board at its June <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald noted that the environmental groups are <br />beginning to take an active role in the process by raising <br />their major concerns in a letter to David Getches. Mr. Getches <br />is replying ,to. that letter, copy of which will be distributed <br />to the Board. In conclusion of the discussion, Mr. McDonald <br />indicated that this item would be considered further at the <br />June meeting. <br /> <br />c. Reauthorization of Endanqered Species Act (Appendix D). <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald stated that bills reauthorizing the Endangered <br />Species Act for periodS of four to five years have been <br />introduced in the House (H. R. 1027) and the Senate (S. 725), <br />respectively. Neither bill proposes substantive amendments to <br />the Act. Hearings were held in the House in mid-March and in <br />the Senate on April 16 and 18. Indications are that both the <br />House and Senate sUbcommittees of jurisdiction will seek to <br />mark-up their respective bills during May. <br /> <br />At its March meeting, the Board outlined its position on <br />the reauthorization of the Act and directed Mr. McDonald to <br />submit testimony on its behalf at any congressional hearings. <br />Five elements comprised the Board's position: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-6- <br />