My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01706
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01706
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:06:07 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:01:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
8/2/1961
Description
Table of Contents, Agenda and Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />L~~J <br /> <br />Affairs Committee of the Congress in response to <br />our proposal made prior to the authorization of <br />this legislation. I am quoting as follows from <br />House Report No. 1087. This Board will find some <br />of these comments here rather amusing: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />'The committee finds that this project is <br />unique in that that there is no public versus <br />private power conflict involved. Representa- <br />tives of the ten private power companies <br />operating in the area presented testimony <br />before the committee indicating their desire <br />to cooperate with the Federal Government in <br />the transmission and marketing of electric <br />power and energy from the Colorado River <br />Storage Project. Their proposal provides <br />essentially that the Secretary construct a <br />backbone transmission line connecting major <br />powerplants of the project and that use be <br />made of the existing systems of the companies <br />and additions thereto to market the power. The <br />companies assured the committee of their will- <br />ingness to serve preference customers either <br />through wheeling or through resales with <br />appropriate safeguards to protect the rights <br />and interests of the preference customers. <br />and of the desire of the private utilities <br />of the area to purchase power in excess of <br />that taken by preference customers. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The proposal by the power companies seemed <br />entirely reasonable to the committee. The <br />proposal is consistent with the policy ex- <br />pressed by Congress for many years in appro- <br />priation acts and elsewhere whereby the Federal <br />Government builds the basic backbone trans- <br />mission system and distribution is made <br />through existing systems where satisfactory <br />arrangements can be worked out. The proce- <br />dure proposed is similar to that which has <br />worked very satisfactorily for the Central <br />Valley Project. <br /> <br />The Department of the Interior advised the <br />Committee that it was sympathetic to the pri- <br />vate power companies' proposal and indicated <br />that suggestions would be given studied <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.