My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01706
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01706
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:06:07 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:01:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
8/2/1961
Description
Table of Contents, Agenda and Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2452 <br /> <br />could be mistaken, I can't prove it, but if it <br />were not for the pressure of this pressure group <br />the preference users - I think these projects <br />would be receiving 6 mills at the bus bars for all <br />of this power without any transportation on the <br />power and I believe that the surplus would be <br />built up sooner, and that the revenue produced <br />would build our participating projects sooner. <br />But that seems to be over the hill now. The <br />price has been established, not at the bus bar, <br />but in this new system of distribution. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I recall vividly the terrible bargain that <br />the bureaucrats, as Larry Sparks has called them, . <br />in the Reclamation Bureau, in the Interior Depart~ <br />ment, made in the sale of the power in the Lower <br />Basin. They've been giving it away for years. <br />They're not entirely responsible for that. Con- <br />gress set up the standards and made the price <br />for that power sufficient to pay for the projects. <br />That would have been all right perhaps, if the <br />Lower Basin's projects had all been counted in <br />and all were finished but that's not true. The <br />Lower Basin has a lot of work to do yet and they <br />ought to get a decent price for that power that <br />they have been selling far under the price of <br />any power in any other part of the country all <br />these years. They ought to be getting the price <br />that they could finish and complete the distribu- <br />tion of water and the control of the water of the. <br />Colorado River, their share of it in the Lower <br />Basin. <br /> <br />So I feel that the Bureau is not coming <br />into this picture entirely with clean hands. I <br />have been trying to ascertain what the facts are. <br />I'm glad that I have been privileged to be here <br />today; I'm glad I've had the opportunity of <br />listening to Larry Sparks' arguments; I hope to <br />hear other arguments here and as a result of <br />these arguments, and a study of these facts, and <br />study of these figures, I hope to be able to cast <br />an intelligent vote if called upon to vote in the <br />Upper Colorado River Commission. We have been <br />anticipating a meeting now for three or four weeks. <br />But I hope that everyone of you who are here <br />today will be impressed with the difficulties <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.