My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01706
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01706
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:06:07 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:01:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
8/2/1961
Description
Table of Contents, Agenda and Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />..tqqtj <br /> <br />MR. MILLER: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />GOV. JOHNSON: <br /> <br />'.'and"I'feel it's a mistake for us - none of us are <br />experts in this political field and we have the <br />staff recommendation. This sets and it will <br />never be changed and that' s fine. I think that <br />the only basis upon which any of us can cast a <br />vote properly upon this proposal, if we have to <br />decide between the investor owned utilities and <br />the Bureau proposals, is on the basis of political <br />philosophy and I don't think this is the place <br />for that kind of a debate or a decision." <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />"Mr. Chairman, first of all I'd like to <br />express my appreciation as a Board member to the <br />Director and his staff for doing this work. I <br />commend his courage in stating a forthright con- <br />clusion. There are undoubtedly many people who <br />don't relish this report. However, as a Board <br />member I am asked to make a choice here. I <br />have read a great deal of this material (I <br />haven't read it all), I have listened to the <br />matter as discussed at previous Board meetings <br />and I do think, before I am asked to vote, I <br />would like to hear the comments of those who <br />are for the investor owned systems if they have <br />anything additional to present at this time." <br /> <br />"Before we go into that I think I'd like to <br />hear, if the Board concurs, from Senator Johnson <br />who has worked closely with this problem and who <br />is our representative on the Upper Colorado River <br />commission. I' d like to have his, thoughts. " <br /> <br />"Mr. Chairman and members of the Board, I've <br />lived with this thing a long time as most of you <br />know. Senator Milliken and I introduced three <br />bills for this Storage Project. None of them <br />were acted upon but they were before the Congress <br />and we've been talking about them for years and <br />years. And then when this final bill that did <br />pass was before the Congress, I didn't think <br />that the bill provided equities for the State of <br />Colorado in the building of our participating <br />projects i~asmuch as we furnish 72% of the water <br />and inasmuch as by state compact we were given <br />the use of 51.75% of the water. I felt that the <br />energy created by that water should be divided up <br />among the states and the State of Colorado should <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.