My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01706
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01706
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:06:07 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:01:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
8/2/1961
Description
Table of Contents, Agenda and Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~qql. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The statement of the Utah Power and Light <br />Company states that these companies will pay taxes <br />to the federal government and the state govern- <br />ments at the rate of $3,280,000 a year if they <br />are allowed to construct this system. Over the <br />86-year period that comes to $282 million in <br />taxes. The brochure of the Public Service Company <br />of Colorado says federal taxes will be $96 million. <br />I do not know over what period, although I assume <br />over the period of study - over the 86-year period. <br />And that comparable local taxes would be paid. <br />Now that comes to $192 million as contrasted with <br />the $282 million information that is being put <br />out by the Utah Power and Light Company. These <br />brochures make great emphasis on what they are <br />going to save the American taxpayer. I have <br />copied their own statements - these are their <br />own figures I am giving you. The Public Service <br />Company of Colorado, in its brochure, states that <br />the combined plan will reduce federal investment <br />by $137 million, reduce interest by $155 million, <br />reduce 0 & M by $174 million, and reduce losses <br />by $76 million, for a total saving to the tax- <br />payers of $542 million. Now what they don't tell <br />the taxpayer in any of these brochures, is the <br />cost to the taxpayer which is contained in their <br />proposal to the federal government. Now the cost, <br />under their own figures, is $562 million. So to <br />save the taxpayers $542 million they charge $562 <br />million. This the taxpayers could stand more of. <br /> <br /> <br />It boils down to one simple philosophy. <br />These companies are in business for profit. They <br />are not here, and rightly so, as charitable insti- <br />tutions. We understand the profit motive. It is <br />the basic backbone makeup of our economy. But <br />what we are trying to do in this project is to get <br />the profits from the power to build these partici- <br />pating projects - not to have the profits siphoned <br />off by the utilities companies. And nowhere, in <br />any of these proposals that went out to the public <br />or to the federal government, are these proposals <br />by the utilities companies ever broken down to <br />the individual segments of lines so that you can <br />see what happens in any given instance. Those are <br />carefully ignored in any and all proposals which <br />have been made. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.