Laserfiche WebLink
<br />tI, <br /> <br />'.f'~ <br />" - <br />" cr <br />-...... ~"1 ~ ...., <br />o p " .. <br />~ a- .:J <br />o _u -9 ~ <br />u ~ - '!!-8. <br />.~ -r,; 0 <br />.. >- >- <br />.;J -- <=>--~ <br />'" --,,- <br />o J -; 0 <br />C>._ e j ~ <br />'""d "":;i V') 0 <br />~ J--~ <br />.........___d-.... <br /><>--..,:" <br />o -J- ,J":: <br />-(.-, """"--+-;: <br />'" :;; ><' ~ <br />..!::r..x~ <br />~ " ""- <br />s: t--~ 0- <br />~ )-0 cJ.~ <br />~ -::: .s " <br />>- a.......-U <br />oI'l v 3:'-Q <br />~ .:i-'- Q <br />~.~ ~ j <br />o .... s. c <br />~ J;-c ~.J <br /> <br />, <br />, <br />\ <br />\ <br />/) <br /> <br />-///' <br /> <br />'- <br /> <br />meritorious one, it was not, <br /> <br />rt'" rVf ~r <br />(\ . ~ <br />as a hydro electrIc power <br />V · <br /> <br />the Board's recently adopte~) <br /> <br />project, in conformance with <br /> <br />------~ <br /> <br />policies. <br /> <br />In addition, Mr. McDonald observed that the <br /> <br />proposed project was more than likely one which would be able <br /> <br /> <br />to obtain construction funding from other sources since, ~ <br /> <br />~ ~ <br /> <br />i A was to be constructed at all, it would have to be found an <br /> <br /> <br />economically viable project. In the discussion which ensued, <br /> <br /> <br />Dr. Daniellson pointed out that the project could perhaps be <br /> <br /> <br />construed as one which, in part, provided for assistance to <br /> <br />irrigated <br /> <br />agriculture since a portIon of the electrical <br /> <br />the hYdrt'p~e~ility was used to pump water for <br />U <br />purposes. Mr. <br /> <br />output of <br /> <br />McDonald agreed that this was <br />~ <br /> <br />indeed the case, but that onA balance, due to the likely <br /> <br /> <br />ability of }~e_ entity to find other sources of financing, he <br /> <br /> <br />would stil~ainst the Board doing a feasibility study. <br /> <br />irrigation <br /> <br />There being no further discussion, Mr. McDonald moved, <br /> <br />seconded by Mr. Pascoe, that the Board not do a feasibility <br /> <br />study for this proposed project. <br />~ <br />unanimous vote. <br />1 <br />With respect to Agenda Item <br /> <br />The motion passed on <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />r'f"J-1~ <br /> <br />2.~E.1, concerning a <br /> <br />proposed study of the Yellow Jacket Water Conservancy <br />......---- <br />District, Mr. McDonald noted that there was no write-up <br /> <br />provided to the Boar~ lW1f in light of the fact that this <br />proposed study had been included by the HOUS~fJL- <br />Representativ~in S.B. 439 and would preSUmablY1~nacte~~nto <br />law. Mr. McDonald went on to explain that, at the in~tive <br />Ai'! <br />of the Yellow Jacket District, an informal consortiu\ of the <br /> <br />/} <br /> <br />, <br />\ <br />I <br />'I <br /> <br /> <br />'.J <br />