My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01703
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01703
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:06:02 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:01:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/5/1981
Description
CWCB Meeting
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />was able to obtain additional information relating to the <br /> <br />questions raised by members of the Board. There being no <br /> <br />further discussion, the motion passed on unanimous voice <br /> <br />vote. Mr. McDonald then proceeded to review for the Board <br /> <br />the proposed feasibility study on the Fuchs Dam (see Appendix <br /> <br />H). Following Mr. McDonald's presentatIon, Mike Fuchs, <br /> <br />representing Fuchs Ranches, Inc., responded to a few <br /> <br />questions from Board members. In particular, in response to <br /> <br />a question from Mr. Robbins, Mr. Fuchs indicated that it was <br /> <br />the intent of the corporation to continue using the water <br /> <br /> <br />stored and developed by the Fuchs~m for irrigation <br /> <br /> <br />purposes. Mr. Danielson also raised questions about the need <br /> <br />to include in the feasibility study an examination of the <br /> <br />desirability of increasing the capacity of the outlet works <br /> <br />on the dam in order that the reservoir can pass those amounts <br /> <br /> <br />of water which ~ired ~ pursuant to the provisions of <br /> <br /> <br />the Rio Grande~ompact. After additional brief discussion, <br /> <br />L- <br /> <br />Dr. Danielson moved, seconded by Mr. McDonald, that the Board <br /> <br />perform a feasibility study of the proposed project, with <br /> <br />said feasibility study to include an analysis of the capacity <br /> <br />of the outlet works and with said feasibility study being <br /> <br />subject to the same conditions contained in the motion <br /> <br />concerning the Beeman project. There being no further <br /> <br />discussion, the motion was passed on unanimous voice vote. <br /> <br />Before introducing the next four proposed feasibility studies <br /> <br />(Mead, Grand Lake, Erie, and Louisville), Mr. McDonald noted <br /> <br />that the request for a feasibility study for the Town of <br /> <br />(- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.