My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01693
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01693
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:05:51 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:01:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/26/1999
Description
Colorado River Basin Issues - Long-Term Funding Legislation
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Key Points . <br />Upper Colorado River and San Juan River Endangered Fish Recovery Program <br />Long-term Funding Legislation <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The bill does not amend the federal Endangered Species Act. It authorizes funding for basin-wide plans <br />for the conservation of four endangered fish species. The bill authorizes the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation <br />to share the costs of building capital construction projects under two intergovernmental programs: <br />. the 1988 Cooperative Agreement to implement the Recovery Implementation Program for the <br />Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River dated September 29, 1987; and, <br />. the 1992 Cooperative Agreement to implement the San Juan River Recovery Implementation <br />Program dated October 21, 1992. <br /> <br />The bill authorizes expenditures of $82 million for Upper Colorado River Recovery Program capital <br />projects through the year 2005; and the expenditure of $18 million for San Juan River Recovery <br />Implementation Program capital projects through the year 2007. Reclamation would pay $46 million <br />toward the cost of completing these projects. The four participating states and power contractors who use <br />hydroelectric power from the Colorado River Storage Project will pay the remaining $54 million. <br /> <br />The capital projects include ponds for the protection of the genetic diversity and propagation of <br />endangered fish, the restoration of floodplain habitat and fish passage, the regulation and/or supply of <br />instream habitat flows, for preventing fish entrapment in canals, and for the removal or relocation of non- <br />native fish. <br /> <br />The bill authorizes Reclamation to spend $6 million annually for costs associated with the two programs. <br />These costs are known as "base funding" costs. This expenditure is authorized through 20 II. After 20 11, <br />base funding is only provided for operating and maintaining capital projects and for on-going monitoring, . <br />unless Congress authorizes additional funding. <br /> <br />The Upper Colorado River Program has provided the reasonable and prudent alternative to "jeopardy" for <br />508 large and small water projects. These projects have an aggregate capability to deplete more than <br />586,000 acre-feet of water per year. <br /> <br />The San Juan River Program, along with the re-operation of Navajo Reservoir, provides the reasonable <br />and prudent alternative for approximately 700,000 acre-feet of preexisting depletions and 51,700 acre-feet <br />of depletions by the Animas-La Plata Project. Continued funding will allow recovery of the fish and <br />provide the reasonable and prudent alternative for new depletions, including tribal depletions. <br /> <br />These cooperative programs are best way to recover the four native fish species. None of the program <br />participants can independently accomplish the programs' measures; continued substantive results can best <br />be provided through collaborative partnerships. The dual objectives of achieving species recovery while <br />providing adequate water supplies has created strong state and local support and vested interest on the <br />part of the programs' participants. The continued issuance of permits and the recovery of the fish and <br />their habitat are dependent on the programs' continued progress. <br /> <br />Most ofthe amendments to the Endangered Species Act considered by Congress contemplate changes in <br />how a species is listed, what constitutes the taking and harassment of a species, or the Act's consultation <br />provisions. None ofthe proposed amendments proposed since 1991 eliminate the need for these recovery <br />programs. Rather, most proposed amendments put greater emphasis on local efforts to protect threatened <br />and endangered species. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.