My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01683
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01683
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:05:48 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:00:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/12/1967
Description
Agenda, Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />economic data into the computer program and <br />see if this will beat our old office methods <br />of computing these. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />We recently started a new preliminary <br />investigation of a watershed up above Jules- <br />burg, the Sedgwick-Sand Draws Watershed, <br />which compric9s about 65,000 acres in two <br />states of which about 9,000 acres are in <br />Cheyenne county and 28,000 acres in Deuel <br />county, Nebraska, and 28,200 acres in Sedg- <br />wick County, Colorado. Most of the floodwater <br />and sediment damages and the possible struc- <br />tural sites are in Colorado and will be planned <br />by the Colorado Watershed planning Staff. <br />Engineering assistance for surveying damsites <br />and floodplain cross sections is being pro- <br />vided by the Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board. We feel that we have a feasible proj~ <br />ect there even though we are just in the <br />preliminary phases. <br /> <br />We have several proposals of preliminary <br />investigations to start in the near future. <br />The principal one would be the cucharas Creek <br />Watershed near Walsenburg which we will start <br />in June. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />As to operations, those are the worle <br />plans that have received congressional approval <br />and are then subject to two things - the <br />people having all of their obligations stacked <br />up and ready to go and our receiving the con- <br />struction funds for the government portion of <br />the project. We have 14 of these projects <br />approved for construction; on 10 of them the <br />construction is completed; we have three under <br />construction which we are going to report on <br />today; and one watershed project approved <br />back in 1962 that is still not under construc- <br />tion because of the problem of easements. This <br />is the Vineland Project just east of Pueblo <br />on the south side of the river. <br /> <br />Under our present operations, the pine <br />River Watershed, comprising 58,000 acres in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.