My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01670
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01670
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:05:15 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:00:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/28/2003
Description
CDP Section - Technical Assistance to Covered Entities
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />j.. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Policy Development Matrix <br />June 2"003 <br /> <br />p...i;1 <br />"--- .-. I <br />i <br /> <br />Polley Components Pollcv Development Ootlons <br />Framework for Conservation Plannlna <br />Accountability What Define specIfic requirements for program Require monitoring and evaluation (method up Require monitoring and evaluation (method up <br />(Requirements for program monitoring & evatuatlonj require periodic to system); require 3 yr Implementation to system); require plans be updated every 5 <br />monitoring/evaluation. progress (annual?) :~orts on ImP:=ntation; require progress report; require plans be updated years <br />reporting, plan updates. etc.} olans be u sled everv -5 ars eveN 5 vears <br /> Why Motivate implementation of plans. Allows local and Same as in high option, but less ambitious Minimal approach to assure some accountability and <br /> state determination of conservation effectiveness. nrovide some useful information to the state <br /> Who All covered entities All covered entities All covered entities <br /> How Add to statute Add to statute Add to statute <br /> Other Only meaningful if state has staff to review Only meaningful if state has staff to review Only meaningful if state has staff to review <br /> considerations documents generated. Suggest updates be stagger~ documents generated. SUggest updates be sfaggerec documents generated. Suggest updates be stagge'''' <br /> to not swamp staff at one time. Perhaps base funding to not swamp staff at one time_ Perhaps base funding to not swamp staff at one time. Perhaps base fundi~~ <br /> application approval on demonstrated implementatio application approval on demonstrated implementatio ar~~4catlon approval on demonstrated implementatlo <br /> of orevlous olan. of Drevious olano of revious olan. <br />Content for Conservation Plans <br />Conservation planning steps What Requirements addressing content resulting Encourage 8 planning steps for all entities Encourage 8 planning steps through non- <br />(Address content resu"ing from from all 8 planning steps. Vary breadth/depth through non-binding guIdance; require 8 steps binding guidance <br />each step) of requirements based on system for entities applytng for funding <br /> Why Improve quality of plans =o~e quality of plans for systems likely In need of Encourage better plan quality <br /> : Dlans . <br /> Who All covered entities; burden varies according to class Funding applicants; others as self-selected Self-selected entities <br /> How Add to statute. Best if gives authority to CWCB to Board adopts policy on approval criteria based on No policy change. Develop guidance. <br /> adopt relevant rules. May need to change 37-60- existing discretion to approve/deny funding <br /> 126(3), but perhaps not if requirements are focused applications @ 37-60-126(9)(b). Best if coordinated <br /> on content resu"ing from planning steps. rather than YJith CWRPOA. <br /> requirina the steos themselves. <br /> Other <br /> considerations <br />Conservation measures and What Add to measures that must be considered. Add to measures that must be considered. Add to measures that must be considered <br />programs Require certain measures be Implemented, Require certain measures be Implemented <br />(To be considered or required) varied by tier/class. under specified conditions: e.g. system leak <br /> reDalr If unaccounted-for water exceeds X%. <br /> Why Improve quality of plans by Increasing scope of Same as for high option, simpler approach Attempt to improve quality of plans <br /> measure consideration and assuring some basic <br /> conservation measures must be imDlemented <br /> Who All covered entities. Substantial implementation self- All covered entities. Substantial implementation self- All covered entities, but real benefit only for entities <br /> selection; required implementation burden varies selection; requirements only for remarkable situations that self-select to implement measures <br /> according to class. and lagga~~Eto current industry standards for good <br /> water mana ement. <br /> How Add measures (considered and required) to statute Add measures (considered and required) to statute Add measures to consider to statute <br /> Other Allow .out- on certain required implementation Allow .out. on certain required implementation <br /> considerations measures if utility shows not cost effective measures if utility shows not cost effective <br /> <br />Notes: <br /> <br />oCost implications of poliCY options TBD (Strategy Phase II). <br />DPo!icy options on incentives for plan development and ~Ian implementation T80 (Stratem Phase II). <br /> <br />, <br />I <br />J <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.