Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1,- <br /> <br />.i <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />· Reduce impacts on the environment; <br /> <br />· Comply with regulations; <br /> <br />· Improve public credibility by demonstrating stewardship of natural and financial resources. <br /> <br />Given that water conservation should be considered in the larger context of sound water <br />management generally, and sound water supply planning in particular, water conservation <br />planning needs to be a well-organized effort. <br /> <br />THE NEED FOR POLICY CHANGE <br /> <br />The main Strategy document [I] summarizes ways in which Colorado's existing water <br />conservation planning statute and existing CWCB policies lag behind the state of the science and <br />the policies of other states in a number of conservation planning areas. A policy white paper [2] <br />developed during preparation ofthe Strategy details the status of Colorado's policies. <br /> <br />Based on the evaluations presented in these documents, Colorado's conservation planning <br />policies could do more to assure local conservation plans are of good and consistent quality and <br />that they are effective in achieving meaningful water conservation. Policy change would help <br />improve the quality of conservation plans prepared under state law and thereby "improve the <br />nature and breadth of conservation practices at the local level," a stated goal of the Colorado <br />Water Conservation Board. <br /> <br />POLICY DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS <br /> <br />While the need for policy change is apparent, the breadth and depth of policy change remains to <br />be determined. Therefore, the attached "Policy Development Matrix" outlines three potential <br />"levels" of change to policies that affect the development of local water conservation plans in the <br />state of Colorado. It is meant to spark discussion of the intent and desire of the State to address <br />conservation planning policy. <br /> <br />The matrix addresses the following potential components of policy change, organized into two <br />categories of policy: <br /> <br />"Framework" policies that set the general terms of conservation planning: <br /> <br />. Threshold: the definition of "covered entity." <br /> <br />. Application: variation of requirements based on water provider characteristics or local <br />conditions. <br /> <br />. Approval criteria: basis for plan review and approval by the state. <br /> <br />. Accountability: approaches to assuring plan implementation. <br /> <br />Policies that address the content of conservation plans: <br /> <br />. Planning steps: content related to the steps of a logical, comprehensive planning <br />process. <br /> <br />. Measures and programs: specific conservation practices to be considered in plans <br />and/or required for implementation. <br /> <br />For each policy component and each level of change, the matrix summarizes: <br /> <br />. What the policy might include; <br /> <br />2 <br />