My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01666
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01666
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:05:07 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:00:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/10/2002
Description
CF Section - Review Scope of Work
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />F~OM DON SCHWINDT <br /> <br />FAX NO. <br /> <br />970-565-3592 Sep. 05 2002 12:35PM P3 <br />. ._____..o__.._......___.______ m , .... . <br /> <br />B) Insert a new Study Objective # 2, : <br /> <br />"Characterize the value of agricultural water U~e to Colorado's economy and identifY water <br />supply alternatives that assure such supplies while addressing new demands for water." <br /> <br />C) Under Task 4a., insert between Vegetation resources and Recreational resources: <br /> <br />"rrrigatcd agricultural rQl;OUrocs" <br /> <br />D) Under Task 5, meke two additions: <br /> <br />add to: Overview of the Colorado economy", with s. special emphasis On the importance of <br />iniBated azricultural to rural Colorado commWlities" <br /> <br />insert: Statewide issuc:s and concorns such as: "consequences associated with" conversion of <br />agriculrural warer rights... <br /> <br />E) Under Task 6: <br /> <br />add a 6d. "Utilize existing resources such as the report and recotrimendatio.US of the <br />Governor's Commission on Saving Open Spaces, Farms & Ranches." <br /> <br />F) Under Task 8: <br />insert a new 8d. "identifY out of basin water supplies that could be physically available" <br /> <br />G) Under Task 9: <br /> <br />add to 9c. ... water supplies may be inadeqU9Xe. "Assume that aaricultural acreage will remain <br />constant in the future unless replaced by M&T." <br /> <br />:H) Under Task 11: M.d these evaluation factors: <br /> <br />"Does the alternative support both urban and rural needs for wawr?" <br />"Does the alternative avoid or mitigate ag water transfers to other usesT <br /> <br />Jfthe answer to these evaluation factors is "no", then the altemative should be modified or <br />e.limi.nated.because it is <;OTltrmy to the objevtives of the SWSI which include recognition of the <br />value of irrigated agriculture. <br /> <br />It i. my goal that the strategies tha,t result f-rom the swsr (Task 12) will be based upon !he prenrised <br />that r shlll"ed above, and that the CWCB advocate projects that bring new Colorado ComplWt ""titled <br />water that is presently leaving the state to the beneficial use of its citizens. <br /> <br />I hope the.oommittee shares my thoughts and can filld appropriate ways to incoIporate them in1Q thcsfinal scope of work. I want us all to be satisiled with the final product. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.