My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01665
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01665
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:05:06 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:00:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/22/2005
Description
ISF Section - Table Rock Properties, LLC (Case No. 5-03CW331) - Injury with Mitigation Proposal
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />tit <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />aquatic/riparian/wetland interaction edge essential for macroinvertebrates <br />Restoration reconnected a number of floodplain and streamside wetlands in the <br />Rock CNek corridor with water flow and saturation due to grade changes <br />provided <br /> <br />The type of restoration completed has been proven to increase trout numbers and standing crop <br />while maintaining or increasing the macroinvertebrate numbers, standing crop and diversity in <br />numerous Rocky Mountain streams over the past 10 years.. We have completed dl'tAhases that <br />show such results on the Blue River above Green Mountain Reservoir, Blue River below Green <br />Mountain Reservoir, Big Creek (YampaRiver Drainage), and the mainstemofthe San <br />Juan(Archuleta County). <br /> <br />The recently reclaimed oxbows on Rock Creek require diversion ofwaters from the creek into the <br />oxbow to mRintam the biota present. During the non-irrigation season and when Rock Creek <br />Flows reach 10 cIS, diversion of water into the reclaimed natural oxbow will require a sharing of <br />the flows in order to protect all of the aquatic biota resident to Rock Creek (approximately 3 <br />years out of 16 as estimated by Western Water Consultants; Table 4). <br /> <br />The condition offisheries in Rock Creek is of critical concern to both the owners of the Table <br />Rock Ranch as well as the State of Colorado. The proposal to share flows of Rock Creek to <br />adequately protect all of the biota and habitat now Iocated within the Table Rock Ranch is unique <br />but not unprecedented To assure the State of Colorado that the biota continues to be protected <br />under this agreement, Table Rock Ranch proposes to monitor the fisheries and macroinvertebrates <br />two out offive subsequent years after an agreement is reached. Monitoring would include <br />qUAntitative fishery sampling including relative fish species ab\lntI..nce, standing crop, length <br />ftequency and macroinvertebrate monitoring using the Biotic Condition Index (Wmget and <br />Mangum, 1979). The resuIts of sampling will be compared to the existing dat..hase that was <br />developed on Rock Creek prior to the completion of the restoration work. <br /> <br />Results of Monitoring 2004: <br /> <br />In Fa112004 monitoring was completed to develop a dllWoose that describes improvements that <br />were achieved on Rock Creek.. Monitoring included re-survey of7 river cross sections, re- <br />evaluation in Rock Creek using the US Forest Service's ChamJeI Stability rating technique and the <br />Trout Habitat Assessment teclmique, completion of six: R2 Cross stre8m cross sections, and <br />completion of two macroinvertebrate stations cont..ining 3 samples each. R2 Cross stream cross <br />sections were co-operatively completed by the Colorado Division of WIldlife (4) and Western <br />Water Consuhants (2). Results of sampling from 2004 were compared to resuhs observed in <br />2002. Sampling locations can be viewed on Figure 1 (Project and sample site location map). <br /> <br />Stream Cross SectioDS: <br /> <br />The results of stream cross sections completed in 2004 were superimposed on cross sections <br />taken at the same locations in 2002. Resuhs of these surveys are illustrated for each station in <br />Appendix I and in Table 1. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.