My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01582
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01582
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:03:26 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:58:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/8/1957
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. PETERSON: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. JERMAN: <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />MR. MOSES: <br /> <br />689 <br /> <br />"It has come to my attention that <br />there has been a change in the specifi- <br />cations of the Glen Canyon Diversion <br />Tunnel. Mr. Jerman, can you explain <br />the enlargement to permit the diversion <br />of the full flow of the Colorado River <br />around the dam?" <br /> <br />"This was done to alleviate a possi- <br />bility of delay of the project by down <br />river interests. It is not anticipated <br />that the entire flow will be passed. I <br />feel there was no intent to prevent stor- <br />age as soon as practicable behind the <br />dam." <br /> <br />"The subject was gone into at great <br />length at the Upper Colorado River Com- <br />mission meeting. The Bureau was convinced <br />that it was better to spend something like <br />$1,000,000.00 to enlarge the tunnel than <br />to risk a delay. It is not the intention <br />to release more water than necessary." <br /> <br />"I think the first item under new busi- <br />ness should be the matter of cooperation <br />with the Agencies of the Federal Govern- <br />ment." <br /> <br />A motion was made and seconded authorizing the Direc- <br />tor to enter into and sign for the Board cooperative agreements <br />with the U. S. G. S. for ground water studies up to $50,000. <br />and gauging stations on the Western Slope projects in the amount <br />of $9,000. <br /> <br />MR. PETERSON: <br /> <br />MR. NELSON: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. MOSES: <br /> <br />"How are the locations of gauging sta- <br />tions determined on the Western Slope?" <br /> <br />"I would like to ask for better liaison <br />between the Board and the two conservancy <br />districts of the Western Slope. Neither <br />the Western Slope members nor the two con- <br />servancy districts knew anything in advance <br />concerning proposed gauging stations, and <br />I feel they should be considered in the <br />locations of these stations." <br /> <br />"The Board will furnish the list of the <br />gauging stations in the Western Slope. The <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.