Laserfiche WebLink
<br />discount rate of 3.25 percent, but only I if the then <br />current discount rate of 6.625 percent was used (the <br />discount rate is now 7.325 percent). <br />(5) The lapse of time, coupled with the whooping crane <br />issue, may also dictate that WPRS issue supplemental <br />environmental analyses before construction. can proceed. <br />The proponents of the Narrows project, the Lower South <br />Platte and Central Colorado Water Conservancy Districts, will <br />be pushing hard this spring for a write-in to the federal FY 82 <br />budget to obtain construction funds. This will raise an issue <br />for the state vis-a-vis the Senator Hart South Platte study, <br />being handled by the Water Conservation Board, which study is <br />examining alternatives to the lower mainstem storage of water, <br />as exemplified by the Narrows. This study will not be completed <br />until early fall, 1981. To date, Monte Pascoe and Bill McDonald <br />have taken the position that the state continues, even in the <br />face of the study, to support the Narrows project and will do so <br />until such time as convincing evidence is brought forth which <br />indicates that the state should reconsider its position. <br /> <br />Water Conservation Board's Position <br />Throughout the 1970's, the Board consistently supported <br />all nine of the state's authorized projects although it did, <br />in 1973, after considerable debate and some controversy, set <br />priorities for the completion of planning and initiation of <br />construction, as follows: <br /> <br />-7- <br />