My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01574
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01574
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:03:24 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:58:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/11/1981
Description
CWCB Meeting
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />for the questions, whereupon a voice vote was taken and the <br /> <br />, <br />} <br />I <br />, <br />, <br />! <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />{ <br /> <br /> <br />f <br />1 <br />f <br />f <br />~ <br />I <br />, <br /> <br />related to the Colorado Water Conservation Board construction <br /> <br />fund must not be construed as stating a general policy of the <br /> <br />Board with regard to the matter of transbasin diversions. <br /> <br />After considerable additional discussion, Mr. Robbins called <br /> <br />motion was declared defeated. <br /> <br />Mr. MacFarlane th~n moved, seconded by Mr. RObbins, that <br /> <br />the Board adopt a project selection policy as printed in <br /> <br />Appendix Q to these minutes. After some additional <br /> <br />1 <br />i <br />,. <br />f <br />!' <br />,. <br />; <br />, <br /> <br />discussions, Mr. Johnston moved, seconded by Mr. Furneaux, <br /> <br />that the motion be tabled until the next regularly scheduled <br /> <br />Board meeting. The motion was declared defeated on a voice <br /> <br />vote. At the suggestion of Mr. Robbins, Mr. Kroeger recessed <br /> <br />the Board for 15 minutes. <br /> <br />Upon reconvening, there was further brief discussion <br /> <br />about the transmoutain diversion issue, at the close of which <br /> <br />Mr. MacFarlane called for the question. The motion passed on <br /> <br />an unanimous voIce vote. Mr McDonald was instructed by <br /> <br />the Board to send the newly adopted policy statement to the <br /> <br />legislative leadership and to all applicants who had requests <br /> <br />for feasibility studies before the Board. <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald then turned to Agenda Item No.4, <br />concerning legislation pending before the General Assembly. <br /> <br />He reported briefly on S.B. 439, S.B. 19, S.B. 414, H.B. 503, <br /> <br /> <br />H.B. 1119, H.B. 1141, H.B. 1498, H.B. 1357, and H.B. 1589. <br /> <br />There was no dIscussion other than a brIef comment by <br /> <br />-13- <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.