Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />4. CRSP power for project pumping <br /> <br />A. Limited to qualified preference customers <br /> <br />B. Limited to what is actually needed for project purposes <br />(i.e.. can't just market it to make money) <br /> <br />5. Salinity component <br /> <br />A. Can power's percentage repayment obligation be changed? <br /> <br />B. Can number of authorized units (and therefore costs) be <br />increased? <br /> <br />6. Measure of what WPDAC is applied to <br /> <br />Internal Colorado Issues <br /> <br />1. Phase 2 of A-LP Project <br /> <br />A. Cost share <br /> <br />B. Eligible at all for theGe revenues <br /> <br />2. Colorado's three "specified" projects <br /> <br />A. Limitations to be spelled out in legislation <br /> <br />B. Contingent deauthorization of these three <br /> <br />C. Savery-Pothook not included <br /> <br />D. Is preference to be given these three projects for <br />funding? <br /> <br />(1) Should they be the first projects funded? <br /> <br />(2) Problems associated with the mechanics of that <br /> <br />(3) Grants of loans? <br /> <br />3. Process for Congressional approval of other projects <br /> <br />4. Funding of Phase 1 of A-LP project from this new system may <br />be forced on us <br /> <br />5. Cooperation with Colorado environmental interests <br /> <br />gl <br /> <br />.... <br /> <br />-2~ <br />