Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />specifically approved by a congressional resolution <br />before these monies could be used for <br />construction. However, states could use these <br />monies without any congressional approval for up to <br />70 percent of the cost of feasibility studies, <br />acquiring the necessary federal, state, and local <br />permits, and NEPA compliance for a project. <br /> <br />6. Status of Unconstructed CRSP Participating Projects <br /> <br />a. The Bonneville Unit I&D system would remain an <br />authorized project purpose, although funding for its <br />construction (subject to the above specified cost sharing) <br />would come from revenues from the water project development <br />assistance component and its costs would not be included in the <br />CRSP ceiling increase. <br /> <br />b. The Uintah and Upalco units of the Central Utah Project <br />would be deemed deauthorized upon approval by Congress of <br />Uintah-Ouray Indian claims settlement legislation. <br /> <br />c, The phase 2 facilities of the Animas-La Plata Project <br />would remain an authorized project purpose, but they would not <br />be Congressionally funded. These facilities could, subject to <br />the above. specified cost sharing, receive funding from the <br />water project development assistance component. <br /> <br />d. The Fruitland Mesa, San Miguel, and West Divide <br />participating projects would be deemed deauthorized only upon <br />receipt by Colorado of $ million (in 1989 dollars) of <br />revenues from this component of the rate. <br /> <br />e. Pending the deauthorization of the units and projects <br />identified in b. and d. above, they would be ineligible to <br />receive Congressional appropriations for construction. The <br />estimated costs allocable to irrigation purposes of the <br />systems, facilities, units, and projects identified in a., b., <br />c., and d. above would not be included in the computation of <br />the irrigation assistance component of the power rate. <br /> <br />f. All other participating projects not now under <br />construction would be deauthorized immediately as part of the <br />implementing legislation contemplated by this agreement. <br /> <br />g. Notwithstanding these immediate and contingent <br />deauthorizations, mwh of firm CRSP energy and mw of <br />firm CRSP capacity would be withdrawable for such project <br />pumping purposes as a state deemed appropriate for projects <br />constructed using the revenues from this component of the <br />rate. The preferential power rate accorded CRSP participating <br />projects would apply. <br /> <br />-7- <br />