My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01559
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01559
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:03:10 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:57:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
2/17/1989
Description
Meeting Notes & Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />UPPER DIVISION STATES' PROPOSAL TO CREDA <br />February 10, 1989 <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />At the January 25, 1989. meeting of the states and CREDA, <br />the states orally presented their position on several issues <br />and agreed that they would commit their position to writing. <br />The purpose of this paper is to do that. This proposal <br />supersedes the oral presentation made on January 25th. <br /> <br />Assumptions <br /> <br />This proposal assumes that the contemplated changes in the <br />power rate, in its computation, and in the use of revenues <br />therefrom; in the contracts with Western; etc.; would require <br />federal implementing legislation and execution of contractual <br />documents among the parties, It further assumes an arrangement <br />commencing on January 1, 1991, and continuing for 40 years. <br /> <br />This proposal assumes that the Dolores Project. Dallas <br />Creek Project, phase 1 facilities of the Animas-La Plata <br />Project, and M&I facilities of. the Bonneville Unit will be <br />completed with Congressional appropriations per the 1956 CRSP <br />Act. It further assumes completion of CRSP storage unit and <br />participating project mitigation requirements (as heretofore <br />identified by Reclamation or as directed by Congress in the <br />federal implementing legislation which this proposal <br />contemplates) with section 8 appropriations per the 1956 CRSP <br />Act. <br /> <br />Components of the Power Rate <br /> <br />1. The power rate would consist of discretely defined <br />components, each one of which would be set separately. The <br />total power rate would be the sum of the components. <br /> <br />2. The components would be as tollows: <br /> <br />a. Annual operation, maintenance, and replacement <br /> <br />b. Repayment of costs allocated to power purposes for <br />investments in service on January I, 1991 <br /> <br />c. Repayment of costs allocated to power purposes for <br />investments placed in service after January 1. 1991 <br /> <br />d. Repayment of costs allocated to irrigation purposes <br />which are beyond the irrigators' ability to repay <br /> <br />9323E <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.