Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />question. Furthermore, this statute was thoroughly debated <br />when it was repealed and reenacted in 1983, with further <br />amendments made in 1985. Thus. the state's pOlicy with respect <br />to the diversion of waters from Colorado has been thoroughly <br />explored in recent years. <br /> <br />In addition, it is important to note that the question of <br /> <br />interstate marketing will turn ultimately on the compacts and <br /> <br /> <br />U.S. Court decrees to which Colorado is subject. Therefore. in <br /> <br />the Board's opinion not much would be gained by study of this <br /> <br />category of issues since state law and pOlicy can only reflect <br /> <br />what is permitted by the relevant compacts and decrees. <br /> <br />State Aqencv Orqanization <br /> <br />Consideration of a state water authority <br /> <br /> <br />*Transfer of the Water Quality Control Division and Commission <br /> <br /> <br />to the Department of Natural Resources <br /> <br />There are several reasons why the Board does not believe <br /> <br />that it would be appropriate for it to examine these issues. <br /> <br />First. it has no particular expertise with regard to <br /> <br /> <br />organizational and institutional arrangements. To the extent <br /> <br /> <br />that the question is one of managerial and organizational <br /> <br />efficiency, there are others better equipped than the Board to <br /> <br />analyze these issues. <br /> <br />-7- <br />