Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Therefore, those two issues would be encompassed in the broader <br />analysis proposed by the Board. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Third, the remaining issues under this category are very <br />specific issues concerning water rights administration. <br />Important though they may be. they do not raise broad pOlicy <br />issues of the nature which it seems most appropriate to address <br />in the context of HJR 1001. The Board believes that it would <br />be better to devote attention to other matters and leave to <br />another time the analysis of these relatively narrow water <br />rights administration questions. <br /> <br />Water Marketinq (Presumablv Interstate) <br /> <br />Does water marketing make sense <br />Statement needed on state water marketing plan and management <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />It is not clear from the way in which these issues are <br /> <br />stated whether "water marketing" refers to intra- or interstate <br /> <br /> <br />transactions. If intra-state marketing is intended. the Board <br /> <br /> <br />would observe that it has long been possible under Colorado's <br /> <br />water rights system for appropriators to sell their water <br /> <br /> <br />rights. Thus. the Board is not aware of any significant pOlicy <br /> <br /> <br />issues which need attention in this regard. <br /> <br />With respect to the issue of interstate water marketing, <br />Article 81 of Title 37. CRS, specifically speaks to this <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-6- <br /> <br />. <br />