My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01502
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01502
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:02:29 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:56:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
4/22/1948
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />83 ' <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Dille, seconded by Mr. Smith, moved that the State of <br />Colorado does not object to the proposal of the Imperial Irriga- <br />tion District, if the State Department finds it is within the <br />scope of the Mexican Water Treaty, provided, however, that any <br />arrangement which is made for the construction and operation <br />of the pOVfer plant at Pilot Knob should be upon the basis that <br />the water to be used there is only water which is available for <br />such use under the Colorado River Compact. <br /> <br />The motion was carried and was declared adopted. <br /> <br />The Director reported on the McCarran Resolution introduced and now <br />pending in Congress for the purpose of seeking Supreme Court interpretation of <br />the Colorado River Compact. He explained the reasons why Colorado should <br />oppose this resolution. <br /> <br />Mr. Dutcher moved that the Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board go on record as being definitely opposed to the McCarran <br />Resolution and the Hinshaw Bill, and that the Director and attorney <br />for the Board be authorized to take such action as they see fit to <br />make such opposition effective. <br /> <br />The motion was seconded, carried, and declared passed. <br /> <br />The Board discussed the Barrett Dill pertaining to the Colorado River <br />Development Fund for investigations. The Director stated that the original <br />Barrett Bill had been revised. He explained its tems and recommended that <br />as revised, it be supported by the Board. <br /> <br />Mr. Smith moved that the Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />approve the Barrett Bill now pending in Congress as it has been <br />revised. <br /> <br />The motion was seconded, carried, and declared passed. <br /> <br />Mr. Tipton discussed the report of the Army Engineers and Bureau of <br />Reclamation on the Middle Rio Grande Proje!lt in New Mexico, and explained some <br />of the features of the plan were considered as adverse to Colorado's plans for <br />the San Luis Valley. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The Director outlined the status of the Collbran project, explaining <br />that a present difficulty is the method of figuring the repayment plan, whether <br />on the basis of the Solicitor's Opinion, or some probable new method determined <br />by the Congress. <br /> <br />The Board adjourned to reconvene at 9:30 a. m., Friday, April 23, 1948 <br /> <br />ncORNING SESSION <br />Friday, April 23, 1948 <br /> <br />The Board was called to order at 9:30 A.Ill., by Vice Chairman Bailey. <br />The Chairman 'called for some Board action, relative to the infonnation <br />received on the Middle Rio Grande Project. <br /> <br />Mr. Dille moved that the comments of Colorado, under Section I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.