My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01494
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01494
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:02:27 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:56:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/21/1998
Description
Federal "Clean Water Action Plan" and EPA's Advance Notice of Proposed Rule Making
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. . <br />&EPA <br /> <br />Fact Sheet <br /> <br />Criteria - 40 CFR 131.11 <br /> <br />Water quality criteria are levels of individual pollutants or water quality characteristics, or <br />descriptions of conditions of a water body that, if met, will generally protect the designated uses <br />of the water. EP A, under section 304(a) of the Act, periodically publishes recommendations <br />(guidance) for use by States and Tribes to set water quality criteria. <br /> <br />There are three principal categories of water quality criteria, and within these broad categories, <br />there are different types of criteria: <br /> <br />. criteria to protect human health (chemical-specific and miCrobiological criteria) <br /> <br />. criteria to protect aquatic life (chemical-specific, toxicity, biological, sediment, and physical <br />criteria such as habitat and flow balance) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. criteria to protect wildlife (chemical-specific criteria) <br /> <br />Many criteria are developed to apply generally. They may also be developed or adapted to apply <br />site-specifically. CW A section 303(a)-(c) requires States authorized Tribes to evaluate the need <br />for water quality criteria to protect designated uses and then to adopt water quality criteria (either <br />EPA's or its own) sufficient to protect designated uses of State or Tribal waters. Economic and <br />technological factors (e.g., the ability of analytical techniques to detect the pollutant and <br />treatment cost considerations) may not be used to justify adoption of criteria that do not protect <br />the designated use. Criteria may be expressed in either narrative or numeric forms. <br /> <br />Narrative criteria are descriptions of conditions necessary for the water body to attain its <br />designated use. Often expressed as "free from" certain characteristics, narrative criteria can be <br />the basis for controlling nuisance conditions, e.g. floating debris or objectionable deposits. <br />Narrative criteria are often the basis for limiting toxicity in discharges. States and Tribes <br />establish narrative criteria where numeric criteria cannot be established or to supplement numeric <br />criteria under 40 CFR 131.11 (b )(2). When a water body is classified for more than one use, <br />criteria necessary to protect the most sensitive use must be applied to the water body (40 CFR <br />131.11 (a)). <br /> <br />Numeric criteria are values expressed as levels, concentrations, toxicity units, or other numbers <br />deemed necessary to protect designated uses. Water quality criteria developed under Section <br />304(a) are based solely on data and scientific judgments on the relationship between pollutant <br />. concentrations and environmental and human health effects. EPA criteria under section 304(a) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.