My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01494
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01494
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:02:27 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:56:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/21/1998
Description
Federal "Clean Water Action Plan" and EPA's Advance Notice of Proposed Rule Making
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />they are in~luded in water quality standards. 40 CFR section 131.3(e). Designated uses focus on <br />. the attainable condition while existing uses focus on the past or present condition. Section <br />131.10 then links these two broad use categories in a manner which intends to ensure that States <br />. and Tribes designate appropriate water uses, reflecting both the existing and attainable uses of <br />each water body. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />It is in designating uses that States and Tribes establish the environmental goals for their water <br />resources, and it is in designating uses that States and Tribes are to evaluate the attainability of <br />those goals. Because water quality standards perform the dual function of establishing water <br />quality goals and ultimately serving as the regulatory basis for water quality-based treatment <br />controls and strategies, a State or Tribe often weighs the environmental, social and economic <br />consequences of its decisions in designating uses. The regulation allows the State or Tribe some <br />flexibility in weighing these considerations and adjusting these goals over time. Reaching a <br />conclusion on the uses that appropriately reflect the potential for a water body, determining the <br />attainability of those goals, and appropriately evaluating the consequences of a designation, <br />involves a balancing of environmental, scientific, technical, economic and social considerations <br />as well as public opinion. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.