My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01483
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01483
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:02:23 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:56:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/24/2000
Description
ISF Section - Recreational Instream Flows - Policy Discussion
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />-~. ,,' - ..,., <br /> <br />830 P.2d 915, City of Thornton By and Through Utilities Bd. v. City of Fort Collins, (Colo. 1992) <br /> <br />land." [d., at 764. Due to the inadequate <br />arguments and an insufficient record, we left <br />unanswered whether such formal acts as permit <br />applications filed with a regulatory body, <br />correspondence between the applicant and another <br />regulatory body, and especially public meetings <br />held by a board of county commissioners and by a <br />city council, performed one or more of the three <br />required functions under the overt act(s) prong of <br />the first step test. [d., at 765. <br /> <br />FN7, That the 1988 amendments relate back. to the <br />1986 application does not mean that an <br />appropriation date will automatically fall on or <br />before the date of the original application. <br />Relation back of amendments to original pleadings <br />means only that the third parties were in fact on <br />adequate notice as of the date of the original <br />pleading, That Thornton was on notice that Fort <br />Collins intended to appropriate Poudre River water <br />as of December 31. 1986, does not mean that Fort <br />Collins met all the requirements of the first step <br />test on or before that date. See Part II A, supra, <br /> <br />FN8. Fort Collins argues that adoption of the Plan <br />should be taken in the context of years of <br />environmental and land use planning. We decline <br />to take this contextual approach because it is <br /> <br />Page 18 <br /> <br />contrary to the first step test and the requirement <br />that specific. acts perform specific functions. <br /> <br />FN9. This issue is important because if that <br />preliminary work cannot be deemed to have <br />performed the second required function, then the <br />appropriation date may fall after December 31. <br />1986, depending on when a substantial measure <br />was taken to apply waters to beneficial use. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />*933_ FNIO. The question may arise as to whether <br />an appropriation of 55 cfs of Poudre River water at <br />the Power Dam is required at all. The Power <br />Dam is upstream from the Nature Dam, The <br />record indicates that water called to the Nature <br />Dam necessarily will pass through the Power <br />Dam. Presumably, any water called to the Power <br />Dam will eventually pass the Nature Dam. Thus, <br />the priority date of the downstream structure, here <br />the Nature Dam, effectively guarantees the water <br />use at the upstream structure, here the Power <br />Dam. However, at some point in time the water <br />use at the Nature Dam may be abandoned while <br />the use at the Power Dam may not. Thus, Fort <br />Collins may validly appropriate the same water by <br />separate structures so long as each structure <br />controls and puts water to beneficial use. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Copyright (c) West Group 1999 No claim to original U.S. Govt. works <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.