Laserfiche WebLink
<br />v............. <br /> <br />close, I suppose I could support a concensus <br />bill if we are at that point. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I didn't really think that we were quite <br />at that point after listening to the conversa- <br />tion yesterday. But in principle I would go <br />along with the concensus if it meets with <br />the approval of, let's say, the other faction <br />as well as, I call it, the Sparks' faction. <br />I don't think I want to point out any small <br />items that we might object to here. If we <br />can agree in principle, I think the small <br />items can be worked out and I could support <br />them. <br /> <br />Thank you." <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: <br /> <br />"Thank you, George. <br /> <br />Ray, do you want to comment at all?" <br /> <br />MR. MOSES: <br /> <br />"George has already said no lawyer turns <br />down a chance to commentl <br /> <br />I think I have an obligation to speak <br />and I think the Board has an obligation to <br />speak. I'm sure the Board does not have to <br />be reminded that one of its primary func- <br />tions is the recommendation of legislation <br />in water matters. That is a difficult and <br />awesome responsibility. I'm glad that the <br />Board has an opportunity today to discuss <br />this and this item alone. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I don't want to take a lot of time <br />saying 'Me too', but I think that this bill <br />does incorporate the best parts of Senate <br />Bill 81. I think it is perhaps more helpful <br />than Senate Bill 81 in spelling out the <br />method of integrating wells with surface <br />rights. It has, I think, the advantage of <br />being one bill which the legislature can <br />look at and avoids the problems which the <br />legislators have mentioned to me of trying <br />to digest the seven bills. I agree with Mr. <br />