My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01477
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01477
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:02:20 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:56:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
2/5/1969
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />O:JUq <br /> <br />conjunction. There are a few that have wells <br />only, but I would say they would be in the <br />minority. The large share have both surface <br />and well rights. The wells, as far as being <br />able to pump them directly into a canal from <br />a measurement standpoint, I can see where we <br />might need that seven or nine engineers down I <br />there in the Valley trying to f~gure out how <br />much flow is coming out of each of those <br />wells, There are a lot of pipelines into <br />the canal that they have their surface rights <br />urider. <br /> <br />Basically I think it is a step in the <br />right direction to get the wells adjudicated <br />and tied in with the surface rights so that <br />we can look at it and see where we go from <br />there. <br /> <br />Thank you." <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: <br /> <br />"Thank you, Hugh. <br /> <br />I think we have taken a rather long <br />amount of time in discussing this among the <br />Board. There are still a few that should <br />be heard from, but I feel that with a single <br />agenda item and the matter of arriving at <br />some agreement in the principle of this water <br />legislation, that this is worthwhile. As is <br />often the case we have a tremendously long <br />agenda, but today we have but the one item <br />and we will go ahead and pursue the thing. <br /> <br />George, representing Ben, do you have <br />any comments you'd care to make at this <br />time?" <br /> <br />MR. ZOELLNER: <br /> <br />"Every lawyer always has a comment to <br />make, even though he is the junior member <br />of the firm that will abdicate tomorrow. I <br />didn't realize that we were perhaps as close <br />to a compromise as has been suggested this <br />morning. I would advocate that principle, <br />of course, of compromise and if we are as <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.