My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01477
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01477
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:02:20 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:56:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
2/5/1969
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: <br /> <br />MR. VANDEMOERI <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: <br /> <br />MR. VANDEMOER: <br /> <br />the wells integrated all right. I think we <br />are going to have to come up with something. <br />I would be in favor of this bill, but I am <br />not going to be in favor of one man appointing <br />these commissions. I think it should be done <br />by a board, whether it is the Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board or some other board. But <br />I do say that this Board has got a competent <br />staff and it has been prepared since 1937. <br />Through the years it has accumulated a pile <br />of references, and it is the material inform- <br />ation that they have that will affect all <br />water users in the state. <br /> <br />The Department of Natural Resources <br />was just formed; formed since I've been on <br />this Board here. I have been on here for a <br />few years. I have nothing against the De- <br />partment of Natural Resources. I have <br />nothing personal against the director. It <br />is just the opinion I have that it would <br />seem that it would be a useless expense for <br />the state to form two boards for water <br />problems that are supposed to be brought <br />and taken care of when this one is already <br />formed. " <br /> <br />"Thank you, Clarence." <br /> <br />"Fred. " <br /> <br />"Herb." <br /> <br />"Clarence, I am going to be like Si. <br />I'm going to be a compromiser too. I think <br />you and I are basically on the same side all <br />the way through, but I don't think there is <br />anything in this one bill that we are talking <br />about, and if there is I am on your side, <br />that is taking anything away from surface <br />water users. If there is, Si missed it too <br />because he sure is not going to vote for a <br />bill if it is going to hurt surface users. <br /> <br />I think everyone in this room knows the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.