Laserfiche WebLink
<br />you. <br />were <br />that <br /> <br />I have forgotten how many. Five of the lakes, I think, that <br />previously submitted are omitted from this recommendation, and <br />is with the concurrence of our staff and the Division of wildlife. <br /> <br />I don't know whether there is anything else from Jackson county Or not. <br /> <br />The final recommendations also contain a little for Boulder and Larimer <br />Counties. As far as we know, there is no controversy about that. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: Is there any discussion by members .of the Board about <br />any of these final appropriations? <br /> <br />MR. FETCHER:. Mr. Chairman, I would mOve .for their approval. <br /> <br />MR. SHERMAN: Second. <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: It has been regularly moved and seconded. Is there <br />any further discussion? (NO response.) All those in favor signify by <br />saying "Aye." (unanimous ayes.) Those opposed? (NO response.) <br /> <br />The final streamflows are approved. <br /> <br />(See Appendix B) <br /> <br />Now, we go to preliminary streamflows. <br /> <br />Duane Helton and I have been working with the Fish and Game and the. <br />staff and the Denver Water Board for some time on a few of these appro- <br />priations. It is my "understanding that the Denver Water Board has <br />retained outside legal consultants to advise them. I have been advised <br />by the representatives of the Denver Water Board that they would like <br />to postpone consideration of some of them tOday. I have not talked. <br />with the Fish and Game, but I think it is the thought of this board <br />that if they can resolve their difficulties without having to bring it <br />before the Board, then that is the Board's desire. I think the~Water <br />Board and the Fish and Game would agree on that statement. <br /> <br />So I feel some embarrassment, representing Denver, that this has been <br />delayed. I have -been assured by Mr. Bob Fis'cher that the report will be <br />out by the end of this month and that; hopefully, the matter. can be <br />resol ved :OY! the meeting on January 17. <br /> <br />I have also told the Denver Water Board that if it isn't resolved by <br />that time, however long it takes, we will perhaps take it up then. And <br />that ought to be encouragement for both sides to get it worked out. I <br />hope we will do that. <br /> <br />So Mr. Fischer, which are the ones that you would like to have postponed <br />at this time? <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. ROBERT FISCHER: Mr. Chairman, we would like to have postponed all <br />of the recommended preliminary flows found on page 3, located in Grand <br />County attributable to the Williams Fork River and its tributaries. <br />That includes all of them on that page. <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: So that that would really leave only, as I see it, <br />these in Pitkin county on the preliminary list. <br /> <br />-20- <br />