My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01415
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01415
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:01:34 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:54:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/1/1978
Description
Agenda, Minutes, Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />and the possibility of Burch-Orr; and until the day comes that that <br />kind of thing is distributed by law to so much capital construction and <br />so much ordinary budget, I think we are going to be faced with a paucity <br />of funds for anything except ongoing budget problems, which is a dis- <br />aster, in my opinion. I think we need to face up to that and try to <br />help with some recognition of that problem or we will not have any funds <br />for construction at all. <br /> <br />Then, of course, we have the political problems that are always present <br />in the legislature, of any increased taxes and the division of them, <br />what percentage will go to whom. <br /> <br />I would urge very strongly that the Colorado Water Conservation BOard <br />do interface with the legislative study that is going on, I think we <br />must, and that we play a major role in it. I believe that we should be <br />a leader in asking for changes and suggesting ideas and that we try to <br />implement the best we can measures that will allow us to have a major <br />water construction fund in this state. It is going to be very difficult. <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: Thank you, Bob. Are there any other comments from <br />members of the Board? (NO response.). <br /> <br />Does any of the audience have any comments? (NO response.) <br /> <br />If not, I would entertain a motion. I think a committee of 11 is big <br />enough. Larry and Fred and I were talking.about the Municipal League <br />and the county Commissioners and the Water Congress and a few others. <br />I would like to give the Director authority to have an II-man committee, <br />two of whom are members of the Board. And with your approval, if the <br />motion carries, I would have some suggestions as to who those Board <br />members might be. <br /> <br />MR. JACKSON: I would so move, Mr. Chairman. <br /> <br />MR. FURNEAUX: Second. <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: Is there any further discussion? (NO response.) All <br />those in favor signify by saying "Aye." (Unanimous ayes.) Those <br />opposed? (NO response.) <br /> <br />The motion carries. <br /> <br />I would like to, with your approval then, ask Mr. Kroeger and Mr. <br />Jackson to be members of that committee. Are there any objections to <br />those? (NO response.) If not, they will be included on the committee. <br />The idea-being, Larry, that we will have a full report by the January <br />17 meeting. <br /> <br />MR. FETCHER: I have a question. Is it the intent on this bill that <br />you are hoping to get introduced to get as many sponsors as possible? <br />I don't know just how that works. <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: Yes, This is only one avenue that we have suggested. There <br />is a lot of flexibility in what we have suggested. We could try to <br /> <br />-11- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.