Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />- 8 - <br /> <br />Water quality implications, <br /> <br />Operational flexibility, <br /> <br />Estimated costs for planning studies, legal activities, environmental mitigation and <br />enhancement, pennitting, design, construction and project operation and management, <br /> <br />Economic feasibility defined as all costs and all benefits resulting from a particular action <br />regardless of to whom they may accrue, <br /> <br />Financial feasibility defined as the ability of sponsoring entities to finance and pay all costs <br />associated with the project or action, and <br /> <br />The degree of uncertainty associated with each configuration, <br /> <br />8b. Conduct a "fatal Daw" analysis as a first step in the screening process, <br /> <br />8c. Conduct a second and, if necessary, a third screening process to narrow the range of <br />configurations. <br /> <br />8d. With input from the Technical Committee and the CWCB staff select one or more preferred <br />configurations or recommend the proj ect as not feasible, <br /> <br />Task 9 - Documentation and Justification of Selected Configurations <br /> <br />, <br />1<ot""'yzt'l:;' <br /> <br />Justify the selection of the preferred project configuration as it compares to other gc!\(;,ally 3<.;<.;"pted-l.4. <br /> <br />water development alternatives, Document the advantages and disadvantages of the preferred <br /> <br />configurations over the other gORerally a",,<;;J'tr~water development alternatives With, regard to <br /> <br />incremental cost differences and benefits. , <br />I~ tj 6'1 ' , <br />()", Z)~1 <br /> <br />9a, Compare the costs and benefits of the preferred project configuration to other geaernlty <br /> <br />aeccpted water development alternatives. <br /> <br />9b, Document all input used in the analysis of the alternatives. <br /> <br />Task 10 - Proiect Development Strategies <br /> <br />; J-+,:r;C7~ ><",J <br /> <br />Detennine project developme rategies for the implementation of the preferred configurations, <br />The strategies will include nput from prospective project users, measures that could be taken on a <br />local, regional or state-wide basis such as new or revised institutional arrangements, statutory <br />revisions, policy changes of various agencies or organizations, and new or revised water project <br />funding methods, Tradeoffs and uncertainties involved in each strategy will be described and <br />compared, <br /> <br />Flood Protection. Water Project Plarming and Financing. Stream and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection. Consenration Planning <br />