Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />-7 - <br /> <br />diversion structures, pump stations, pipelines and tunnels. Hydropower development will be <br />considered where it appears to have sigIjificant potential to r'ji'ay some portion of the ~ect L <br />constru, ction and operatipn costs. r..t: ItycAoJ"?''':'<'7 Je..../~, IJ.;j7,.,!e.:1f.n,I<v; ~"7"" (["J-t r' <br />, t':f-./4- f"'14 ri -I-eH"!ln~J 1.;.z;,/vtj~V -Hv ~S'" I 74'f/' 5 h1/ ";-V'f5-n I- '1-v~ <br /> <br />~tz "'^ \7a, Select ~tructural and non-structural plan elements for suitability in formulating <br />$J::;,..~, onfiguratlOns, <br />t,".~(tHt~ <br /> <br />b. Develop a methodology or rationale for the formulation of configurations. <br /> <br />7c, Develop alternatives using appropriate combinations of structural and non-structural <br />elements, <br /> <br />Task 8 - Evaluation ofProiect Configurations <br /> <br />Configurations will be evaluated in a multi-step screening process. Existing data, computer models <br />and decision support systems should be utilized to the maximum extent possible, <br /> <br />The first step in the screening process will be the identification of "fatal flaws" in any particular plan <br />element so as to eliminate that item from further consideration, Subsequent screening steps will <br />consist of more detailed analyses, Configurations may be reformulated and reevaluated in an <br />iterative evaluation process, <br /> <br />An evaluation procedure will be developed using a matrix or matrices so that each configuration <br />may be easily compared with all other configurations under consideration, The procedure will have <br />the capability of analyzing configurations while varying the values or weights used in the evaluation, <br />-+"k <br />The final step in this task will be the selection of one or more project configurations that appear ~ <br />be feasible, Selection will be accomplished by recommendations of the Technical Committee and <br />review by the Colorado Water Conservation Board, <br /> <br />8a, Develop a methodology for the evaluation of configurations to describe the process and the <br />evaluation factors to be used. Some suggested evaluation factors are: ~ ,'e /2 <br />.z.,w '1 <br />Project yield and reliability, If cJvdl'i::; .fIv r:-~';";. / ~ Ir;t; ::; n (/ J I h'j 4-7'; ~7 fp <br />.e.'fJF{/,.j./~ It, k", JI-"'/::__N~ "''t/ S"",J.I; ~h1R b.r/'<?J _ (l <br />Ability to deliver projected water supply demands, <br /> <br />Permitting considerations, <br /> <br />Public and political acceptability, <br /> <br />Coordination with local and regional planning efforts, <br /> <br />Capacity to comply with Federal water rights issues, and other legal and compact constraints, <br /> <br />Impacts on the natural environment, the man-made environment and the existing social <br />setting, <br /> <br />Flood Protection. Water Project Planning and Financing. Stream and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection. Conservation Planning <br />