Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MRS. JAMES: Not if you assist us in our efforts. <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: We'll receive that ,and I will give it to our roughest <br />member, Mr. Robbins. Will you carry that for us? (Laughter.) <br /> <br />He's got a helmet and everything else. Thank you, Mrs. James. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />. <br />Are there any further comments from the ,floor on the Dove Creek project? <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: I might add, Mr. Chairman, that the Dolores Water Con- <br />servancy District is active in assisting Dove Creek with this problem <br />and will be, I assume, one of the project sponsors. <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: Any comments from the Board? <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: Mr. Chairman, I am aware that Dove Creek, being not too <br />far from my town, has a critical water supply and has had for many, <br />many years. They're heavily indebted for the amount of water system <br />that has already been provided, and I think they need this badly. I <br />would move that thesBoard accept this as one of the projects. <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: It's been moved. Is there a second? <br /> <br />MR. LEINSDORF: Second. <br />MR. STAPLETON: Any discussion? <br />(No response.) <br />MR. STAPLETON: All those in favor, signify by saying "Aye." <br />(Unanimous "Ayes.") <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: Opposed? <br /> <br />(No response.) <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: It is ordered submitted and I gather that the technical <br />language is that we submit it for the approval of the legislature. Is <br />that correct? <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: That's correct. Are we going to wait until we get through <br />before we actually establish priorities, or are we establishing priorities <br />at this time? <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: I thought we didn't need priorities. Well, I'll ask the <br />Board. I am told we will not need priorities. And on that basis, I <br />would think we would submit all twelve. <br /> <br />If that's not true, then I would presume we would take the staff's recom- <br />mendations as to the priorities unless we hear to the contrary from the <br />Board.members as we went through these discussions? I don't want to pre- <br />judge as to priority twelve when we have only heard the first one. But <br />it would be my thought that technically I gather we've got sufficient <br /> <br />-11- <br />