Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />With the reinstatement of the surplus provisions of the Interim Surplus Guidelines (IS G), the <br />Lower Division States' consumptive use of Colorado River water for calendar year 2004 is based on <br />a partial domestic surplus, As ofFeb, I, the Lower Division States' consumptive use of <br />Colorado River water for calendar year 2003, totaled 7.832 mafbefore deduction of 0,195 maf <br />for unmeasured return flow credits and was distributed as follows: Arizona, 3,035 maf; <br />California, 4.492 maf; and Nevada, 0,305 maf. In 2003 the Central Arizona Project (CAP) <br />diverted 1.686 maf, of which 0,213 mafis to be credited to the Arizona Water Bank, The <br />Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) used about 0,684 maf or 55 percent of <br />its actual use of mainstream water in 2002, <br /> <br />The preliminary <br />end-of-year <br />measure for 2003 <br />California <br />agricultural <br />consumptive use <br />of Colorado <br />River water <br />under the first <br />three priorities <br />and the sixth <br />priority of the <br />1931 California <br />Seven Party <br />Agreement is <br />measured as <br />3,750mafas <br />shown in the <br />attached graph, <br />The target under the ISG for the end of 2003 was 3,740 maf, thus California is in substantial <br />compliance with the ISG. <br /> <br />Yuma Desalting Plant and Arizona Colorado River Operational Priorities Workshop: On <br />Feb, 2, the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) hosted a meeting with interested <br />parties, including several American and Mexican non-governmental organization, to discuss <br />Arizona's Colorado River operational priorities, particularly those related to potential operation <br />of the Yuma Desalting Plan (YDP) and impacts to the Cienega de Santa Clara, This meeting was <br />scheduled in response to separate letters written to Arizona's Governor Napolitano by several <br />environmental organizations and the Board ofthe Central Arizona Water Conservation District. The <br />letters discussed the relationship between operation of the YDP, potential impacts to the Cienega de <br />Santa Clara, and potential impacts to Arizona's long-term water supply needs, <br /> <br />ADWR, identified the purposes ofthe meeting as the following: (1) IdentifY the water <br />management goals and objectives; and (2) IdentifY the potential options that might help in meeting <br />these water management goals and objectives, <br /> <br />During the discussion, the participants identified the following major categories of water <br />management goals and objectives: <br /> <br />. Protect and preserve Arizona's Colorado River water entitlement; <br />. Decrease the risk of shortage to users of mainstream water; <br />. Adhere to the Law of the River; <br /> <br />January 1 Forecast of 2003 Year-End Colorado River <br />Water Use by the California Agricultural Agencies <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />3,850 MAF <br />2003 Target = 3,74 MAF <br />. . . - . - 2006 Target = 3,64 MAF <br />- - - 2009 Target = 3.53 MAF <br />- - 2012 Target = 3,47 MAF <br />____ Year-End Forecast <br />. Use This Year <br /> <br />1ii 4 <br />.. <br />.... <br />.. <br />t; 3 <br />" <br />'0 <br />~ 2 <br />~ <br />i 1 <br /> <br /> <br />- ~ - - . - . . ~ . ~ - . - - - .. - . .. . " " - . <br />- =--- . . . .. - - - <br /> <br />o <br />J <br /> <br />F M A M J <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />A SON 0 J <br /> <br />First of Month <br /> <br />15 <br />