My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01352
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01352
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:00:52 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:53:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
2/1/1966
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. SLIZESKI: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />NR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />MR. SLIZESKI: <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />the required legal sponsorship for the Ever- <br />green problem area inasmuch as the town of <br />Evergreen is an unincorporated municipality. <br /> <br />That is about the substance of our report <br />'today. " <br /> <br />"As you know. there was some publicity <br />in the papers over the week end about starting <br />construction in 1968 instead of '67 on Chat- <br />field. Can you bring us up to date? I am <br />sure you are aware of the comments in the <br />papers. " <br /> <br />"I'm sorry but I wasn' t a~lare of that <br />but my latest information is that our planning <br />schedule was still based on letting a construc- <br />tion contract in the spring of 1967." <br /> <br />"Larry. can you comment at all on that <br />newspaper report?" <br /> <br />"Yes. There is some question whether or <br />not the recommended budget includes sufficient <br />funds to actually let the contract. It is <br />my understanding that the budget request did <br />contain sufficient funds to complete all the <br />detailed planning necessary to let a contract <br />for construction. Apparently. though. there <br />is some misgiving that a contract could not <br />be let in the spring of '67 with the amount <br />of funds programed." <br /> <br />"This is true. The moneys available to <br />us now are sufficient for completion of what <br />we call our general design memorandum. There <br />aren't any construction funds in the current <br />President's budget." <br /> <br />"I understand that Congressman Rogers and <br />Congressman MCVicker will make an issue of <br />this with the Appropriations Committee and <br />will attempt to secure funds which will permit <br />the award of a contract. Senators Allott and <br />Dominick will do the same in the Senate. t'le <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.