My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01323
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01323
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:00:24 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:53:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/11/1978
Description
Agenda, Minutes, Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />permanent pool in the.reservoir for fishery and recreational purposes. <br />The United States took the, position that if the state wanted a perma- <br />nent pool, it would have to be at the expense of the state. However, <br />the United States is providing the facility without charge to the <br />state. Subsequently, the Colorado General Assembly did appropriate <br />some money to obtain the necessary water rights to maintain that <br />reservoir at approximately 20,000 acre-feet. The actual amount of <br />water required after the initial filling, would be to replace the <br />annual evaporation, which averages something like 3,000 acre-feet per <br />year. : <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />At the same time that the project was being designed, immediately after <br />the 1965 floods, I w1;"ote to variolls municipalities here in the metro- <br />politan area advising them t~at we could make capacity available in <br />the reservoir for municipal and industrial storage if anyone wanted it <br />in accordance with the laws governing the repayments for conservation <br />capacity. I wrote to every municipality here in the metropolitan area. <br />Every municipality that we contacted indicated that it had,no need for <br />. storage space in Chatfield Reservoir. Our staff realized that this was <br />an erroneous assumption, but there was nothing we could do about it. <br />In order to specifically allocate space, we had to,have an executed <br />contract with the United States for such space. Because of the urgency <br />of getting the project constructed'as a result of the '65: floods, the <br />project was therefore constructed without any specific allocation for <br />municipal, industrial or agricultural storage. <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.