Laserfiche WebLink
<br />permanent pool in the.reservoir for fishery and recreational purposes. <br />The United States took the, position that if the state wanted a perma- <br />nent pool, it would have to be at the expense of the state. However, <br />the United States is providing the facility without charge to the <br />state. Subsequently, the Colorado General Assembly did appropriate <br />some money to obtain the necessary water rights to maintain that <br />reservoir at approximately 20,000 acre-feet. The actual amount of <br />water required after the initial filling, would be to replace the <br />annual evaporation, which averages something like 3,000 acre-feet per <br />year. : <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />At the same time that the project was being designed, immediately after <br />the 1965 floods, I w1;"ote to variolls municipalities here in the metro- <br />politan area advising them t~at we could make capacity available in <br />the reservoir for municipal and industrial storage if anyone wanted it <br />in accordance with the laws governing the repayments for conservation <br />capacity. I wrote to every municipality here in the metropolitan area. <br />Every municipality that we contacted indicated that it had,no need for <br />. storage space in Chatfield Reservoir. Our staff realized that this was <br />an erroneous assumption, but there was nothing we could do about it. <br />In order to specifically allocate space, we had to,have an executed <br />contract with the United States for such space. Because of the urgency <br />of getting the project constructed'as a result of the '65: floods, the <br />project was therefore constructed without any specific allocation for <br />municipal, industrial or agricultural storage. <br /> <br />-2- <br />