My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01311
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01311
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:00:09 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:53:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/24/2000
Description
ISF Section - Approval of Fourmile and Oil Creek Hearing Orders
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />t <br /> <br /> <br />!ibEf.x)(4 1: -tf".rr, b <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />KEN SALAZAR <br />Attorney General <br />BARBARA McDoNNELL <br />Chief Deputy Attorney General <br />ALAN J. GILBERT <br />Solicitor General <br /> <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DEPARTMENT OF LAW <br /> <br />STATE SERVICES BUILDING <br />1525 Sherman Street. 5th Floor <br />Denverr Colorado 80203 <br />Phone 303) 866-4500 <br />FAX 303) 866-5691 <br /> <br />OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL <br /> <br />July 13,2000 <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> <br />FROM: Jennifer 1. Gimbel, Hearing Officer <br /> <br />RE: Fourmile Creek and Oil Creek Prehearing Conference <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The parties to the Fourmile Creek and Oil Creek ISF hearings met on July 7, 2000 for a <br />pre hearing conference, The parties discussed and agreed upon several procedural issues, <br />identified the substantive issues to be addressed at the hearing, and identified how much time <br />they want for their presentations at the hearing. Because several issues in both proceedings <br />overlap, the parties agreed that the hearings could be combined for the sake of efficiency. The <br />parties' time requests for their presentations are noted on the prehearing order. These estimates <br />do not include time for questions from the Board or other Parties, I believe that the time requests <br />are reasonable, <br /> <br />It appears that, to give the parties their requested time slots and to allow for Board <br />deliberations, the combined hearing may take I Y, days, Of course, the Board has discretion to <br />limit the amount of time for the hearing, but given the controversial aspects of these ISF <br />appropriations, it is recommended that the Board give the parties and the public ample time to <br />present their views, <br /> <br />I have attached a draft prehearing order for your review and approval at the July Board <br />meeting. Once you decide the amount of time for the hearing, I will make adjustments to the <br />presentation time requests and send out the order, <br /> <br />cc: Parties to Fourmile Creek and Oil Creek Proceedings <br /> <br />e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.