Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />-, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />David Harrison: <br /> <br />Patricia Wells: <br /> <br />David Harrison: <br /> <br />Patricia Wells: <br /> <br />David Harrison: <br /> <br />Patricia Wells: <br /> <br />Janice Sheftel: <br /> <br />David Harrison: <br /> <br />Janice Sheftel: <br /> <br />Jim Lochhead: <br /> <br />The natural environment to a reasonable degree.. <br /> <br />Including particularly the environment of the listed fish species. <br /> <br />OK, this is a good track that we're on here then...is there anything... <br /> <br />I've got one more... <br /> <br />Yes, in respect to where you modify the staff recommendation. <br /> <br />Right, in 5, relating to Ray Wright's comment, down at the bottom, I <br />would strike "and recover" and strike "critical" on the second line, so it <br />would read "to conserve the endangered fish and their habitat in the Yampa <br />River", since habitat and critical habitat are both terms that aren't under the <br />Endangered Species Act, that we may not be capable of dealing with. <br /> <br />Now, isn't conserve...conserve I thought was a special word in that. <br /> <br />(inaudible)..conservation...not critical....Conservation was the defined <br />term... <br /> <br />I know...that's why I know...!'m worried about using the word conserve. <br /> <br />Help recover...assist in the recovery of... <br /> <br />Eric Kuhn: Its the same words you just mentioned, David. <br /> <br />Jennifer Gimbel(?) How about to assist in the recovery of? <br /> <br />David Harrison: How does that sound, people? <br /> <br />Ray Wright: That sounds good. <br /> <br />Jennifer Gimbel Do you want to get around...you don't want to refer to recovery of the <br />fish? <br /> <br />Eric Kuhn: Seems to me...yes, we don't want to refer to words that are... <br /> <br />Janice Sheftel: Why not? <br /> <br />David Harrison: <br /> <br />See...to me the distinction was whether we somehow were going to state <br />a purpose that maybe seemed like we were exclusively in charge of it, that <br />this water right was the exclusive tool, things that are way out of context. <br />Seems to me that assisting in the recovery of the fish puts it in the correct <br /> <br />Minutes of December 13, 1995 Special CWCB Meeting <br />